Cited by 91Graphene research and applicationsAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

A stretchable crumpled graphene photodetector with plasmonically enhanced photoresponsivity

Kim, Minsu, Kang, Pilgyu, Leem, Juyoung, Nam, SungWoo·2017·Nanoscale

Abstract

Graphene has been widely explored for flexible, high-performance photodetectors due to its exceptional mechanical strength, broadband absorption, and high carrier mobility. However, the low stretchability and limited photoabsorption of graphene have restricted its applications in flexible and highly sensitive photodetection systems. Various hybrid systems based on photonic or plasmonic nanostructures have been introduced to improve the limited photoresponsivity of graphene photodetectors. In most cases, the hybrid systems succeeded in the enhancement of photoresponsivity, but showed limited mechanical stretchability. Here, we demonstrate a stretchable photodetector based on a crumpled graphene-gold nanoparticle (AuNP) hybrid structure with ∼1200% enhanced photoresponsivity, compared to a conventional flat graphene-only photodetector, and exceptional mechanical stretchability up to a 200% tensile strain. We achieve plasmonically enhanced photoresponsivity by integrating AuNPs with graphene. By crumpling the hybrid structure, we realize mechanical stretchability and further enhancement of the optical absorption by densification. We also demonstrate that our highly stretchable photodetector with enhanced photoresponsivity can be integrated on a contact lens and a spring structure. We believe that our stretchable, high performance graphene photodetector can find broad applications for conformable and flexible optical sensors and dynamic mechanical strain sensors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6nr09338h

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For wearable photodetectors, various materials such as crumpled graphene-AuNPs, ZnO nanostructures, rGO/PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites, MoS2/WS2 heterojunction arrays, Zn2SnO4 NWs, and SnO2 NWs were employed for detection of UV, IR, or other light illumination, based on the principle that light illumination can excite more electrons into the conduction band generating photocurrent.

    “For wearable photodetectors, various materials such as crumpled graphene-AuNPs, [177] ZnO nanostructures, [82,178,179] rGO/ PVDF-TrFE nanocomposites, [180] MoS 2 /WS 2 heterojunction arrays, [181] Zn 2 SnO 4 NWs, [182] SnO 2 NWs [31,183] were employed for the detection of UV, [31,82,178,179,182,183] infrared (IR), [180] or other light illumination, [177,181] based on the principle that light”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

  • A 12 times enhancement in photoresponsivity was realized compared to a flat graphene based photodetector, owing to the areal densification induced by the crumpled structure and the enhanced optical absorption induced by the plasmonic nanostructure of AuNPs.

    “12 times enhancement in the photoresponsivity was realized compared to a flat graphene based photodetector, owing to the areal densification induced by the crumpled structure and the enhanced optical absorption induced by the plasmonic nanostructure of AuNPs.”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

  • Due to the crumpled structure, the photodetector can withstand 200% tensile strain, with 20% decrease in the photocurrent at 200% strain.

    “Also due to the crumpled structure, the photodetector can withstand 200% tensile strain, with 20% decrease in the photocurrent at 200% strain.”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

  • The fabricated stretchable photodetector was attached on a contact lens.

    “Figure 6h shows the fabricated stretchable photodetector attached on a contact lens.”

    From Nanomaterial-Enabled Wearable Sensors for Healthcare (2018) · cites this paper as [177]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 91

Authors
Kim, M., Kang, P., Leem, J., & Nam, S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Nam, SungWoo
Venue
Nanoscale
Published
2017
Volume
9
Issue
12
Pages
4058-4065
ISSN
  • 2040-3364 (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-3372
OpenAlex
W2577371430
Cited by
91
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanoscale (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX16AR56G)
  • Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation (1554019)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AOARD-13-4125, FA9550-16-1-0251)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Keywords
graphene, gold nanoparticles, plasmonic enhancement, photoresponsivity, light absorption enhancement, tensile strain, strain sensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review