Cited by 11Organic Electronics and PhotovoltaicsPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine ChemistryPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Porphyrin dimers as donors for solution-processed bulk heterojunction organic solar cells

Abstract

We synthesize a novel class of porphyrin dimers consisting of two zinc-metalated porphyrin units covalently linked through ethynyl or butadiyne group as electron donors for the fabrication of organic bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6ra04746g

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dimers usually show a higher efficiency in comparison with monomers.

    “Dimers usually show a higher e ffi ciency in comparison with monomers.”
  • The higher intrinsic carrier mobility of F10 is due to the longer π-conjugation bridge.

    “The higher intrinsic carrier mobility of F10 is due to the longer p -conjugation bridge.”
  • Intrinsic hole mobilities of F9 and F10 are 4.5×10−4 and 6.3×10−4 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively.

    “Intrinsic hole mobilities of F9 and F10 are 4.5 -10 4 and 6.3 -10 4 cm 2 V 1 s 1 , respectively.”
  • F10 blend processed from a mixed solvent of 3% v/v 1-chloronaphathalene (CN) in o-DCB improved efficiency to 2.03%.

    “Its e ffi ciency can be further improved to 2.03% when the F10 blend was processed from a mixed solvent of 3% v/v 1-chloronaphathalene (CN) in o -DCB.”
  • F9 and F10 with PC71BM showed PCEs of 1.24% and 1.73%, respectively.

    “The two donors fabricated with PC71BM showed PCEs of 1.24% ( F9 ) and 1.73% ( F10 ).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Krebs, 2009, J. Mater. Chem., 19, 5442, 10.1039/b823001c · DOI
  2. Nielsen, 2010, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 94, 1553, 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.04.074 · DOI
  3. Hau, 2008, Appl. Phys. Lett., 92, 253301, 10.1063/1.2945281 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2009, Nat. Photonics, 3, 649, 10.1038/nphoton.2009.192 · DOI
  5. Liu, 2014, Nat. Commun., 5, 5293, 10.1038/ncomms6293 · DOI
  6. Liang, 2010, Adv. Energy Mater., 22, E135, 10.1002/adma.200903528 · DOI
  7. Shang, 2011, Adv. Mater., 23, 1554, 10.1002/adma.201004445 · DOI
  8. Wei, 2011, ACS Nano, 6, 972, 10.1021/nn204676j · DOI
  9. Mishra, 2012, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51, 2020, 10.1002/anie.201102326 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Zhang, 2015, Nat. Photonics, 9, 35, 10.1038/nphoton.2014.269 · DOI
  11. Zhou, 2013, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 8484, 10.1021/ja403318y · DOI
  12. Kyaw, 2013, Nano Lett., 13, 3796, 10.1021/nl401758g · DOI
  13. Liu, 2013, Sci. Rep., 3, 3356, 10.1038/srep03356 · DOI
  14. Tang, 1975, Nature, 254, 507, 10.1038/254507a0 · DOI
  15. Goetzberger, 2003, Mater. Sci. Eng., R, 40, 1, 10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00092-X · DOI
  16. K. M. Kadish , E. V.Caemelbecke and G.Royal, in The Porphyrin Handbook, ed. K. M. Kadish, K. M. Smith and R. Guilard, Springer, US, 2000, vol. 8, ch. 55
  17. Lee, 2008, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 836, 10.1021/ja077661h · DOI
  18. Yella, 2011, Science, 334, 629, 10.1126/science.1209688 · DOI
  19. Mathew, 2014, Nat. Chem., 6, 242, 10.1038/nchem.1861 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Campbell, 2007, J. Phys. Chem. C, 111, 11760, 10.1021/jp0750598 · DOI
  21. Sun, 2012, Nat. Mater., 11, 44, 10.1038/nmat3160 · DOI
  22. Steinmann, 2011, Adv. Energy Mater., 1, 888, 10.1002/aenm.201100283 · DOI
  23. Steinberger, 2011, Chem. Commun., 47, 1982, 10.1039/c0cc04541a · DOI
  24. Sun, 2007, Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 253505, 10.1063/1.2823586 · DOI
  25. Oku, 2010, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 71, 551, 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.12.034 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Sharma, 2014, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 5968, 10.1021/jp500090h · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hatano, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 19258, 10.1039/c2jm33956k · DOI · Paper page
  28. Pesika, 2002, J. Phys. Chem. B, 106, 6985, 10.1021/jp0144606 · DOI
  29. Hatano, 2012, J. Mater. Chem., 22, 19258, 10.1039/c2jm33956k · DOI · Paper page
  30. Sharma, 2014, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 5968, 10.1021/jp500090h · DOI · Paper page
  31. Li, 2011, Adv. Funct. Mater., 21, 1419, 10.1002/adfm.201002154 · DOI
  32. Chen, 2013, ChemSusChem, 6, 20, 10.1002/cssc.201200609 · DOI
  33. Blom, 1997, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys., 55, R656, 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R656 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hsu, F.-C., Hsieh, M.-K., Kashi, C., Yeh, C.-Y., Lin, T.-Y., & Chen, Y.-F.
Affiliations
  • National United University (TW)
  • National Taiwan Ocean University (TW)
  • National Chung Hsing University (TW)
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Hsu, Fang-Chi
  • Yeh, Chen-Yu
Venue
RSC Advances
Published
2016
Volume
6
Issue
65
Pages
60626-60632
ISSN
2046-2069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2432314468
Cited by
11
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
RSC Advances (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Keywords
porphyrin dimers, zinc porphyrin, electron donors, bulk heterojunction solar cells, organic solar cells, solution processing, ethynyl linker

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review