The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fracture toughness of hydrogels: measurement and interpretation
Abstract
The fracture mechanics of hydrogels, especially those with significantly enhanced toughness, has attracted extensive research interests. In this article we discuss the experimental measurement and theoretical interpretation of the fracture toughness for soft hydrogels. We first review the definition of fracture toughness for elastic materials, and the commonly used experimental configurations to measure it. In reality most gels are inelastic. For gels that are rate insensitive, we discuss how to interpret the fracture toughness associated with two distinct scenarios: crack initiation and steady-state crack propagation. A formulation to estimate energy dissipation during steady-state crack propagation is developed, and connections to previous models in the literature are made. For gels with rate-dependent behaviors, we review the physical mechanisms responsible for the rate-dependence, and outline the difficulties to rigorously define the fracture toughness for both crack initiation and propagation. We conclude by discussing a few fundamental questions on the fracture of tough gels that are yet to be answered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
Griffith, A. A. (1921) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 · Cited by 11,052
Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications
Drury, J. L., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00340-5 · Cited by 5,136
Hydrogels in Biology and Medicine: From Molecular Principles to Bionanotechnology
Peppas, N. A., Hilt, J. Z., Khademhosseini, A., & Langer, R. (2006) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200501612 · Cited by 4,109
Independent Control of Rigidity and Toughness of Polymeric Hydrogels
Kong, H. J., Wong, E., & Mooney, D. J. (2003) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma034137w · Cited by 224
Cited by
Hydrogel Bioink Reinforcement for Additive Manufacturing: A Focused Review of Emerging Strategies
Chimene, D., Kaunas, R., & Gaharwar, A. K. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902026 · Cited by 600
50th Anniversary Perspective: Networks and Gels: Soft but Dynamic and Tough
Creton, C. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01698 · Cited by 463
Fatigue fracture of tough hydrogels
Bai, R., Yang, Q., Tang, J., Morelle, X. P., Vlassak, J., & Suo, Z. (2017) · Extreme Mechanics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.eml.2017.07.002 · Cited by 312
Hydrogels for Flexible Electronics
Zhang, Y., Tan, Y., Lao, J., Gao, H., & Yu, J. (2023) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c02897 · Cited by 291
Fiber‐Reinforced Viscoelastomers Show Extraordinary Crack Resistance That Exceeds Metals
Cui, W., King, D. R., Huang, Y., Chen, L., Sun, T. L., Guo, Y., Saruwatari, Y., Hui, C., Kurokawa, T., & Gong, J. P. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201907180 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Long, R., & Hui, C.-Y.
- Venue
- Soft Matter
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 8069-8086
- ISSN
- 1744-683X (ISSN-L)
- 1744-6848
- OpenAlex
- W2520073413
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fracture toughness of hydrogels: measurement and interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6sm01694d
- The paper
- Long, R., & Hui, C.-Y. (2016). Fracture toughness of hydrogels: measurement and interpretation. Soft Matter. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sm01694d
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.