Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 214

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ionic liquid-based electrolytes for “beyond lithium” battery technologies

Giffin, Guinevere A.·2016·Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Abstract

One of the significant challenges common to “beyond lithium” battery technologies is the development of safe and reliable electrolytes. In this review an overview of the use of ionic liquids (IL) as electrolytes for sodium, magnesium, aluminum and zinc batteries is provided. The current state of IL-based electrolytes, along with the advantages of ILs and the challenges from the perspective of the electrolyte, is presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c6ta05260f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 214

Metadata

Authors
Giffin, G. A.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Published
2016
Volume
4
Issue
35
Pages
13378-13389
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
OpenAlex
W2512224162
Cited by
214
References
1
FWCI
9.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ionic liquid-based electrolytes for “beyond lithium” battery technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c6ta05260f
The paper
Giffin, G. A. (2016). Ionic liquid-based electrolytes for “beyond lithium” battery technologies. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta05260f

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.