The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design strategies for nonaqueous multivalent-ion and monovalent-ion battery anodes
Open accessAbstract
The inability of current battery technologies to keep up with the performance requirements of industry is pushing forward developments in electrochemistry. Specifically, the battery’s negative electrode, the anode, presents many unique chemical, physical and engineering challenges. Lithium-based battery technologies have dominated the past decade, but concerns about the limited supply of lithium in the Earth’s crust have led researchers to look towards alternative metal-ion technologies. Various alkali metals (such as sodium and potassium) and alkali earth metals (such as magnesium and calcium) have attracted significant research interest. In this Review, we analyse these technologies in a coherent manner, addressing the problems of each type of anode, rather than those of specific types of metal-ion batteries. Covering direct metal plating and stripping, intercalation-based, alloy-based and conversion-reaction-based anode technologies, this analysis will offer the reader a comprehensive understanding of the behaviour of different metal-ion anodes and of what can be learned by transferring knowledge between these different systems. Increasing demand for energy-storage systems will inevitably stress the Earth’s lithium supply; thus, the research focus is shifting towards other alkali and alkali earth metals. This Review compares and connects strategies to enable different multivalent and monovalent metal-ion battery anodes, including metal anodes and intercalation-based, alloy-based and conversion-reaction-based anodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation
Jain, A., Ong, S. P., Hautier, G., Chen, W., Richards, W. D., Dacek, S., Cholia, S., Gunter, D., Skinner, D., Ceder, G., et al. (2013) · APL Materials · doi:10.1063/1.4812323 · Cited by 13,094
Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries
Yabuuchi, N., Kubota, K., Dahbi, M., & Komaba, S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500192f · Cited by 6,478
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
30 Years of Lithium‐Ion Batteries
Li, M., Lu, J., Chen, Z., & Amine, K. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201800561 · Cited by 6,039
Self-citationSlater, M. D., Kim, D., Lee, E., & Johnson, C. S. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201200691 · Cited by 4,518
Anomalous Increase in Carbon Capacitance at Pore Sizes Less Than 1 Nanometer
Chmiola, J., Yushin, G., Gogotsi, Y., Portet, C., Simon, P., & Taberna, P. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132195 · Cited by 4,022
A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries
Verma, P., Maire, P., & Novák, P. (2010) · Electrochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2010.05.072 · Cited by 2,903
Architecture of graphdiyne nanoscale films
Li, G., Li, Y., Liu, H., Guo, Y., Li, Y., & Zhu, D. (2010) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/b922733d · Cited by 2,826
Self-citationFrom Lithium‐Ion to Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Advantages, Challenges, and Surprises
Nayak, P. K., Yang, L., Brehm, W., & Adelhelm, P. (2018) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201703772 · Cited by 2,674
An ultrafast rechargeable aluminium-ion battery
Lin, M.-C., Gong, M., Lu, B., Wu, Y., Wang, D.-Y., Guan, M., Angell, M., Chen, C., Yang, J., Hwang, B.-J., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14340 · Cited by 2,491
Cited by
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Zhang, W., Lu, J., & Guo, Z. (2021) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.015 · Cited by 336
Self-citationXue, P., Guo, C., Li, L., Li, H., Luo, D., Tan, L., & Chen, Z. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202110047 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Lu, J., Ji, X., Li, Y., Shao, Y., Chen, Z., Zhong, C., & Amine, K.
- Venue
- Nature Reviews Materials
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 276-294
- ISSN
- 2058-8437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3004614903
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 164
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design strategies for nonaqueous multivalent-ion and monovalent-ion battery anodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41578-019-0166-4
- The paper
- Li, M., Lu, J., Ji, X., Li, Y., Shao, Y., Chen, Z., Zhong, C., & Amine, K. (2020). Design strategies for nonaqueous multivalent-ion and monovalent-ion battery anodes. Nature Reviews Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0166-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
