Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gas/vapour separation using ultra-microporous metal–organic frameworks: insights into the structure/separation relationship

Adil, Karim, Belmabkhout, Youssef, Pillai, Renjith S., Cadiau, Amandine, Bhatt, Prashant M., Assen, Ayalew H., Maurin, Guillaume, Eddaoudi, Mohamed·2017·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

In this tutorial review we discuss the latest developments in ultra-microporous MOF adsorbents and their use as separating agents via thermodynamics and/or kinetics and molecular sieving.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7cs00153c

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,324

Metadata

Authors
Adil, K., Belmabkhout, Y., Pillai, R. S., Cadiau, A., Bhatt, P. M., Assen, A. H., Maurin, G., & Eddaoudi, M.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2017
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
3402-3430
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2617009200
Cited by
1,324
References
4
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.