Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 820

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 322 of the 322 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging

Open access
Huang, Xiaolin, Song, Jibin, Yung, Bryant C., Huang, Xiaohua, Xiong, Yonghua, Chen, Xiaoyuan·2018·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Conventional optical nanoprobes rely on absolute intensity-dependent signal readout, which can often cause erroneous sensing and imaging results owing to the existence of analyte-independent confounding factors. Ratiometric signal processing provides built-in self-calibration for signal correction, enabling more accurate molecular detection and imaging.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7cs00612h

Cites

322 of 322 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 322 references

Cited by

See all 820

Metadata

Authors
Huang, X., Song, J., Yung, B. C., Huang, X., Xiong, Y., & Chen, X.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2018
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
2873-2920
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2790413946
Cited by
820
References
322
FWCI
6.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c7cs00612h
The paper
Huang, X., Song, J., Yung, B. C., Huang, X., Xiong, Y., & Chen, X. (2018). Ratiometric optical nanoprobes enable accurate molecular detection and imaging. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00612h

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.