Cited by 80Trace Elements in HealthAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity

Cross talk between neurometals and amyloidogenic proteins at the synapse and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases.

Kawahara, M., Kato-Negishi, M., Tanaka, K.·2017·Metallomics

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that disruption of metal homeostasis contributes to the pathogenesis of various neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, prion diseases, Lewy body diseases, and vascular dementia. Conformational changes of disease-related proteins (amyloidogenic proteins), such as β-amyloid protein, prion proteins, and α-synuclein, are well-established contributors to neurotoxicity and to the pathogenesis of these diseases. Recent studies have demonstrated that these amyloidogenic proteins are metalloproteins that bind trace elements, including zinc, iron, copper, and manganese, and play significant roles in the maintenance of metal homeostasis. We present a current review of the role of trace elements in the functions and toxicity of amyloidogenic proteins, and propose a hypothesis integrating metal homeostasis and the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases that is focused on the interactions among metals and between metals and amyloidogenic proteins at the synapse, considering that these amyloidogenic proteins and metals are co-localized at the synapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c7mt00046d

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many individuals are likely to develop LOAD due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors.

    “Studies also suggest that genetic factors may only contribute between 50 and 70% of the risk for LOAD, meaning many individuals are likely to develop LOAD due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors (Kawahara et al., 2017; Sarkar et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021).”
  • Genetic factors may contribute only between 50 and 70% of the risk for LOAD.

    “Studies also suggest that genetic factors may only contribute between 50 and 70% of the risk for LOAD, meaning many individuals are likely to develop LOAD due to a combination of genetic and environmental factors (Kawahara et al., 2017; Sarkar et al., 2019; Rahman et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2021).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawahara, M., Kato-Negishi, M., & Tanaka, K.
Affiliations
Musashino University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawahara, M.
Venue
Metallomics
Published
2017
Volume
9
Issue
6
Pages
619-633
ISSN
  • 1756-5901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-591X
OpenAlex
W2609523813
Cited by
80
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Metallomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26460177)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
metal homeostasis, trace elements, amyloidogenic proteins, synapses, neurodegenerative diseases, Alzheimer's disease, prion disease, Lewy body disease, vascular dementia, zinc, iron, copper, manganese, metalloproteins, protein conformational change, neurotoxicity, metal-protein interactions
MeSH terms
Humans, Synapses, Trace Elements, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Amyloidogenic Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review