Cited by 27Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsBone Metabolism and Diseases

Regenerating infected bone defects with osteocompatible microspheres possessing antibacterial activity

Wei, Peng-Fei, Yuan, Zuo-Ying, Jing, Wei, Guan, Bin-Bin, Liu, Zi-Hao, Zhang, Xu, Mao, Jian-Ping, Chen, Da-Fu +2 more·2019·Biomaterials Science

Abstract

Treatment of infected bone defects still remains a formidable clinical challenge, and the design of bone implants with both anti-bacterial activity and -osteogenesis effects is nowadays regarded as a powerful strategy for infection control and bone healing. In the present study, bioresorbable porous-structured microspheres were fabricated from an amphiphilic block copolymer composed of poly(l-lactide) and poly(ethyl glycol) blocks. After being surface coated with mussel-inspired polydopamine, the microspheres were loaded with nanosilver via the reduction of silver nitrate and apatite via biomineralization in sequence. At optimized loading amounts, the nanosilver-loaded microspheres showed no unfavorable effects on the proliferation and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells despite preserving strong antibacterial activity in in vitro evaluations. For the critical-sized defects (φ = 8 mm) in the rat cranium that was pre-infected with Staphylococcus aureus, the filling of the dual-purpose microspheres demonstrated an effective way to kill bacteria in vivo, and in the meantime, it promoted new bone formation efficiently alongside the degradation of microspheres. Thus, the results suggested that bioresorbable microspheres with both osteoconductive and antibacterial activities were a good choice for treating infected bone defects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8bm00903a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, P.-F., Yuan, Z.-Y., Jing, W., Guan, B.-B., Liu, Z.-H., Zhang, X., Mao, J.-P., Chen, D.-F., Cai, Q., & Yang, X.-P.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites; Beijing Laboratory of Biomedical Materials; Beijing University of Chemical Technology
  • Tianjin Medical University General Hospital (CN)
  • Tianjin Medical University (CN)
  • Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN)
  • Laboratory of Bone Tissue Engineering
  • State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composite Materials (CN)
Corresponding author
Cai, Qing
Venue
Biomaterials Science
Published
2019
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
272-286
ISSN
  • 2047-4830 (ISSN-L)
  • 2047-4849
OpenAlex
W2900262171
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biomaterials Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (51473016, 51873018)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (7182068, 7161001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
infected bone defects, antibacterial activity, silver nanoparticles, polydopamine coating, mesenchymal stem cells, Staphylococcus aureus, critical-size calvarial defect, bone regeneration, osteoconduction
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Apatites, Bone Regeneration, Cell Line, Indoles, Microspheres, Osteogenesis, Polymers, Silver, Skull, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Coated Materials, Biocompatible, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review