Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 156 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rational design of yolk–shell nanostructures for photocatalysis

Li, Ang, Zhu, Wenjin, Li, Chengcheng, Wang, Tuo, Gong, Jinlong·2019·Chemical Society Reviews

Abstract

Yolk–shell structures provide an ideal platform for the rational regulation and effective utilization of charge carriers because of their void space and large surface areas. Furthermore, the efficiency of charge behavior in every step can be further improved by many strategies. This review describes the synthesis of yolk–shell structures and their effect for the enhancement of heterogeneous photocatalysis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8cs00711j

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 156 references

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Li, A., Zhu, W., Li, C., Wang, T., & Gong, J.
Venue
Chemical Society Reviews
Published
2019
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
1874-1907
ISSN
  • 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-4744
OpenAlex
W2904727063
Cited by
346
References
156
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rational design of yolk–shell nanostructures for photocatalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c8cs00711j
The paper
Li, A., Zhu, W., Li, C., Wang, T., & Gong, J. (2019). Rational design of yolk–shell nanostructures for photocatalysis. Chemical Society Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00711j

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.