Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 833

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aqueous vs. nonaqueous Zn-ion batteries: consequences of the desolvation penalty at the interface

Open access
Kundu, Dipan, Hosseini Vajargah, Shahrzad, Wan, Liwen, Adams, Brian, Prendergast, David, Nazar, Linda F.·2018·Energy & Environmental Science

Abstract

Comparison of intercalation of Zn 2+ in layered V 3 O 7·H 2 O in non-aqueous and aqueous electrolytes reveals a much higher desolvation penalty at the non-aqueous interface, a major factor in dictating the kinetics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c8ee00378e

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 833

Metadata

Authors
Kundu, D., Hosseini Vajargah, S., Wan, L., Adams, B., Prendergast, D., & Nazar, L. F.
Venue
Energy & Environmental Science
Published
2018
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
881-892
ISSN
  • 1754-5692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-5706
OpenAlex
W2788749521
Cited by
833
References
4
FWCI
31.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aqueous vs. nonaqueous Zn-ion batteries: consequences of the desolvation penalty at the interface. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1039/c8ee00378e
The paper
Kundu, D., Hosseini Vajargah, S., Wan, L., Adams, B., Prendergast, D., & Nazar, L. F. (2018). Aqueous vs. nonaqueous Zn-ion batteries: consequences of the desolvation penalty at the interface. Energy & Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee00378e

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.