The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tools and methods for circular dichroism spectroscopy of proteins: a tutorial review
Open accessAbstract
This tutorial review discusses current methods and resources available for good practice data collection and analyses of circular dichroism spectroscopy, a widely-used method for examining the structures and conformational changes of proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kabsch, W., & Sander, C. (1983) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.360221211 · Cited by 15,320
UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge
The UniProt Consortium (2019) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049 · Cited by 7,698
Cited by
Miles, A. J., Ramalli, S. G., & Wallace, B. A. (2022) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.4153 · Cited by 478
Self-citationHuang, B., Fan, T., Wang, K., Zhang, H., Yu, C., Nie, S., Qi, Y., Zheng, W.-M., Han, J., Fan, Z., et al. (2023) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btad122 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, A. J., Janes, R. W., & Wallace, B. A.
- Venue
- Chemical Society Reviews
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8400-8413
- ISSN
- 0306-0012 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-4744
- OpenAlex
- W3170217324
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
