CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent developments of a co-immobilized laccase–mediator system: a review

Gu, Yaohua, Yuan, Lin, Jia, Leina, Xue, Ping, Yao, Huiqin·2021·RSC Advances
DOI 10.1039/d1ra05104kPMC PMC9040808
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The laccase–mediator is a promising biocatalyst with many possible applications, including bioremediation, chemical synthesis, biobleaching of paper pulp, biosensing, textile finishing and wine stabilization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d1ra05104k

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 The structure (a) and active center (b) of laccase.
Fig. 1 The structure (a) and active center (b) of laccase.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Catalytic mechanism of laccase.5
Fig. 2 Catalytic mechanism of laccase.5CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Typical catalytic mechanism of LMS.
Fig. 3 Typical catalytic mechanism of LMS.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Layered double hydroxide of Zn–Cr–ABTS.41
Fig. 4 Layered double hydroxide of Zn–Cr–ABTS.41CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Co-immobilized laccase–acetylacetone system.43
Fig. 5 Co-immobilized laccase–acetylacetone system.43CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 MIL-100(Fe) immobilized laccase–ABTS by impregnated adsorption.44
Fig. 6 MIL-100(Fe) immobilized laccase–ABTS by impregnated adsorption.44CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Degradation of indole and acridine by co-immobilized laccase–ABTS.47,48
Fig. 7 Degradation of indole and acridine by co-immobilized laccase–ABTS.47,48CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Yoshida, 1883, J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 43, 472, 10.1039/CT8834300472 · DOI
  2. Riva, 2006, Trends Biotechnol., 24, 219, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.03.006 · DOI
  3. Solomon, 2008, Dalton Trans., 3921, 10.1039/b800799c · DOI
  4. Mayer, 2002, Phytochemistry, 60, 551, 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00171-1 · DOI
  5. Christenson, 2004, Electroanalysis, 16, 1074, 10.1002/elan.200403004 · DOI
  6. Yaropolov, 1996, Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg., 40, 49, 10.1016/0302-4598(96)01919-8 · DOI
  7. Xu, 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 2052, 10.1128/AEM.66.5.2052-2056.2000 · DOI
  8. Munk, 2015, Biotechnol. Adv., 33, 13, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Patel, 2018, Biochem. Eng. J., 132, 1, 10.1016/j.bej.2017.12.013 · DOI
  10. Morozova, 2007, Prikl. Biokhim. Mikrobiol., 43, 583
  11. Bourbonnais, 1990, FEBS Lett., 267, 99, 10.1016/0014-5793(90)80298-W · DOI
  12. Li, 1998, Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem., 27, 239, 10.1111/j.1470-8744.1998.tb00500.x · DOI
  13. Valls, 2010, Biochem. Eng. J., 49, 401, 10.1016/j.bej.2010.02.002 · DOI
  14. Johannes, 2000, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66, 524, 10.1128/AEM.66.2.524-528.2000 · DOI
  15. Khlifi-Slama, 2012, J. Microbiol., 50, 226, 10.1007/s12275-012-1421-1 · DOI
  16. Zhang, 2012, Colloids Surf., B, 97, 7, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.04.001 · DOI
  17. Luo, 2009, Chem. Ind. For. Prod., 29, 53
  18. Luo, 2015, Chin. J. Appl. Environ. Biol, 21, 987
  19. Camarero, 2005, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 7, 1775, 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1775-1784.2005 · DOI
  20. Camarero, 2007, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1264, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.09.016 · DOI
  21. Yang, 2015, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22, 10882, 10.1007/s11356-015-4312-2 · DOI
  22. Fillat, 2010, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 4104, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.057 · DOI
  23. Mai, 2000, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 54, 510, 10.1007/s002530000452 · DOI
  24. Sheldon, 2013, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 6223, 10.1039/C3CS60075K · DOI · Paper page
  25. Roger, 2007, Adv. Synth. Catal., 349, 1289, 10.1002/adsc.200700082 · DOI
  26. Jesionowski, 2014, Adsorption, 20, 801, 10.1007/s10450-014-9623-y · DOI
  27. Cristóvão, 2011, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 72, 6, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2011.04.014 · DOI
  28. Jian, 2021, Chem. Eng. J., 418, 129473, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129473 · DOI
  29. Sun, 2021, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 21
  30. Zhang, 2018, J. Biosci. Bioeng., 126, 69, 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2018.01.021 · DOI
  31. Kashefi, 2019, J. Mol. Liq., 276, 153, 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.156 · DOI
  32. Skoronski, 2017, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 99, 121, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.02.076 · DOI
  33. Lassouane, 2019, Bioresour. Technol., 271, 360, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.129 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Chen, 2013, Adv. J. Food Sci. Technol., 5, 932, 10.19026/ajfst.5.3185 · DOI
  35. Zheng, 2016, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 110, 69, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.03.004 · DOI
  36. Chhabra, 2015, Biochem. Eng. J., 93, 17, 10.1016/j.bej.2014.09.007 · DOI
  37. Chhabra, 2009, J. Biotechnol., 143, 69, 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.06.011 · DOI
  38. Yang, 2009, J. Hazard. Mater., 169, 113, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.067 · DOI
  39. Therias, 1996, Langmuir, 12, 4914, 10.1021/la9601014 · DOI
  40. Zebda, 2011, Electrochim. Acta, 56, 10378, 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.01.101 · DOI
  41. Jahangiri, 2014, Molecules, 19, 11860, 10.3390/molecules190811860 · DOI
  42. Sun, 2016, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 471, 20, 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.03.009 · DOI
  43. Patra, 2016, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8, 20012, 10.1021/acsami.6b05289 · DOI
  44. Liu, 2017, Molecules, 22, 920, 10.3390/molecules22060920 · DOI
  45. Gao, 2018, Bioresour. Bioprocess., 5, 1, 10.1186/s40643-018-0215-7 · DOI
  46. Gu, 2019, J. Hazard. Mater., 365, 118, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.10.076 · DOI
  47. Xue, 2020, Colloids Surf., B, 196, 111348, 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111348 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 80

Metadata

Authors
Gu, Y., Yuan, L., Jia, L., Xue, P., & Yao, H.
Affiliations
  • Key Laboratory of Environmental Factors and Chronic Disease Control, School of Public Health and Management, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
  • College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China
  • School of Basic Medical Sciences, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
ORCID
Gu, Yaohua
Venue
RSC Advances
Publisher
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Published
2021
Volume
11
Issue
47
Pages
29498-29506
ISSN
2046-2069
DOI
10.1039/d1ra05104k
PMC
PMC9040808
Cited by
80
References
1
Language
en
Update notices
correction (2022-05-27)
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (vor, 244 d)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21663020)
  • Ningxia Medical University (XT2020017)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review