N, P co-doped graphene-supported monometallic nanoparticles for highly efficient hydrogen evolution by acid electrolysis of water
Abstract
Pt/rGNP exhibits much higher catalytic properties than other transition metal/rGNP catalysts for hydrogen evolution; its overpotential at 100 mA cm −2 in 0.5 M H 2 SO 4 is only 10.6 mV, and its Tafel slope is 14.53 mV dec −1 .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pt is considered one of the most efficient catalysts concerning low overpotential, small Tafel slope, and high exchange current density.
“Pt is considered one of the most efficient catalysts concerning low overpotential (g), small Tafel slope, and high exchange current density [2, 10–12].”
From Synergistic interaction of monodisperse Pt nanoparticles with defect‐rich graphene aerogel for efficient acidic hydrogen evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
High Pt NPs dispersion is achieved at low loading of precious metal.
“Hence, high Pt NPs dispersion is achieved at low loading of precious metal [2, 26].”
From Synergistic interaction of monodisperse Pt nanoparticles with defect‐rich graphene aerogel for efficient acidic hydrogen evolution (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes?
De Luna, P., Hahn, C., Higgins, D., Jaffer, S. A., Jaramillo, T. F., & Sargent, E. H. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aav3506 · Cited by 3,052 · see citing works
Platinum single-atom and cluster catalysis of the hydrogen evolution reaction
Cheng, N., Stambula, S., Wang, D., Banis, M. N., Liu, J., Riese, A., Xiao, B., Li, R., Sham, T.-K., Liu, L.-M., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13638 · Cited by 2,072 · see citing works
Single atom electrocatalysts supported on graphene or graphene-like carbons
Fei, H., Dong, J., Chen, D., Hu, T., Duan, X., Shakir, I., Huang, Y., & Duan, X. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00422j · Cited by 673 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yao, H., Yu, X., Jia, Y., Zhang, J., Yao, J., Liu, J., Su, B., & Guo, X. (2025) · Rare Metals · doi:10.1007/s12598-024-03111-y · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, F., Zeng, L., Pei, A., Feng, Y., & Zhu, L.
- Affiliations
- Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, Lihua
- Venue
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 2024
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 10300-10306
- ISSN
- 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
- 2050-7496
- OpenAlex
- W4392548551
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 14
- FWCI
- 5.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (22162012, 22202089)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20224ACB213005)
- Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (JXUSTQJBJ2019002)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Hydrogen Storage and Materials
- Keywords
- hydrogen evolution reaction, nitrogen and phosphorus co-doping, monometallic nanoparticles, platinum catalysts, acid electrolysis, water splitting, electrocatalysis, overpotential, Tafel slope
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
