Cited by 5Advancements in Battery MaterialsSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationExtraction and Separation Processes

Graphene triggered catalytic attack on plastic waste produces graphitic shell encapsulation on cobalt nanoparticles for ferromagnetism and stable Li + ion storage

Open access
Palanisamy, Manikandan, Perumal, Ramakrishnan, Zhang, Di, Wang, Haiyan, Maximova, Olga, Rokhinson, Leonid, Pol, Vilas G.·2024·Journal of Materials Chemistry A

Abstract

Plastic wastes produced graphitic carbon shell encapsulation on cobalt nanoparticles and the derived composite materials showed ferromagnetism and superior Li + ion storage of 377 mA h g –1 (Co-GNP-ZipC) and 509 mA h g –1 (Co-GNP-FmC) at the 250 th cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d4ta01354a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Palanisamy and colleagues achieved ultra-rapid conversion (2 min) of waste polyethylene and polystyrene via microwave catalytic technology, preparing core-shell composites of graphite-encapsulated cobalt nanoparticles (Co-GNP).

    “Differing from hierarchical pores, Palanisamy and colleagues achieved ultra-rapid conversion (2 min) of waste polyethylene and polystyrene via microwave catalytic technology, preparing coreshell composites of graphite-encapsulated cobalt nanoparticles (Co-GNP) [125] .”
  • Waste plastic-derived Co-GNP-ZipC and Co-GNP-FmC retained reversible capacities of 377 and 509 mAh/g (coulombic efficiency ~101%) at the 250th cycle, far superior to pristine Co-GNP (<1 mAh/g).

    “Cycling performance showed that the waste plastic-derived Co-GNP-ZipC and Co-GNP-FmC retained reversible capacities of 377 and 509 mAh/g (coulombic efficiency ~101%) at the 250 th cycle, far superior to the pristine Co-GNP (< 1 mAh/g).”
  • The graphitic shell effectively isolates the cobalt core from the electrolyte, suppressing side reactions and mitigating volume strain, thereby significantly enhancing lithium storage stability.

    “The graphitic shell effectively isolates the cobalt core from the electrolyte, suppressing side reactions and mitigating volume strain, thereby significantly enhancing lithium storage stability.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 5

Authors
Palanisamy, M., Perumal, R., Zhang, D., Wang, H., Maximova, O., Rokhinson, L., & Pol, V. G.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM TRP Engineering College, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, 621105, India
Corresponding author
  • Palanisamy, Manikandan
  • Pol, Vilas G.
Venue
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Published
2024
Volume
12
Issue
30
Pages
19081-19093
ISSN
  • 2050-7488 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-7496
OpenAlex
W4400463584
Cited by
5
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Materials Chemistry A (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Davidson School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
Keywords
plastic waste, graphene, cobalt nanoparticles, graphitic carbon shell, ferromagnetism, lithium-ion storage, lithium-ion battery anodes, waste-derived materials, composite materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review