Cited by 8Machine Learning in Materials ScienceComputational and Text Analysis MethodsAdvanced Text Analysis Techniques

Optimizing data extraction from materials science literature: a study of tools using large language models

Open access
Ning, Wenkai, Li, Musen, Reimers, Jeffrey R., Kobayashi, Rika·2026·Digital Discovery

Abstract

Benchmarking five AI tools on materials science literature shows promising capabilities, but performance remains inadequate for large-scale data extraction. Our analysis offers detailed insight and guidance for future methodological improvements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d5dd00482a

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ning, W., Li, M., Reimers, J. R., & Kobayashi, R.
Affiliations
  • Shanghai University (CN)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Venue
Digital Discovery
Published
2026
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
698-715
ISSN
2635-098X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417187428
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Digital Discovery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (12347164, 12404276, 2024T170541, GZC20231535)
  • Australian Research Council (CE230100021)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
Keywords
data extraction, materials science literature, large language models, literature mining, research data extraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review