Cited by 12Scientific Computing and Data ManagementArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsMachine Learning in Materials Science

DynaMate: Leveraging AI-agents for customized research workflows

Open access
Mendible-Barreto, Orlando A., Díaz-Maldonado, Misael, Carmona Esteva, Fernando J., Torres, J. Emmanuel, Córdova-Figueroa, Ubaldo M., Colón, Yamil J.·2025·Molecular Systems Design & Engineering

Abstract

Developments related to large language models (LLMs) have deeply impacted everyday activities and offer the potential to automate complex research workflows involving repetitive and time-consuming tasks. The presented template enables the rapid incorporation of custom tools with LLM agents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/d5me00062a

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These papers typically split the workflow into role-specific agents for planning, structure retrieval, simulation execution, analysis, and quality control.

    “These papers typically split the workflow into role-specific agents for planning, structure retrieval, simulation execution, analysis, and quality control [18,19,21,25,26,35-38,41,42].”

    From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Overview of agents and tools (page unavailable) describes five specialized agents and a scheduler. It identifies agents for system preparation, simulation execution, and analysis, including a convergence check that serves a quality-control function. It does not describe separate agents for planning or structure retrieval, so the full list of roles is not supported by this paper. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Papers such as SmartCIF, DynaMate, VASPilot, Matty, GENIUS, and ToPolyAgent show that a substantial share of the current advance lies not in replacing scientific judgment with text generation, but in making brittle infrastructural steps programmable and recoverable.

    “Papers such as SmartCIF, DynaMate, VASPilot, Matty, GENIUS, and ToPolyAgent show that a substantial share of the current advance lies not in replacing scientific judgment with text generation, but in making these brittle infrastructural steps programmable and recoverable [21,25,37-39,42].”

    From From Scientific Copilots to Tool-Grounded Autonomy: AI Agents in Simulation-Driven Materials Discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The remaining literature was distributed across general materials-workflow papers, atomistic simulation infrastructures, MOF and porous-material screening, and polymer simulation.

    “The remaining literature was distributed across general materials-workflow papers, atomistic simulation infrastructures, MOF and porous-material screening, and polymer simulation [17,21,22,24-26,32,35-42].”
  • Other papers were more demonstrative, emphasizing workflow feasibility, design navigation, or case-based success rather than tightly standardized metrics.

    “Other papers were more demonstrative, emphasizing workflow feasibility, design navigation, or case-based success rather than tightly standardized metrics [17,18,21,22,35,37-39,41].”
  • Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly.

    “Some studies are simulator-native: the agent configures or executes atomistic or thermodynamic tools directly [21,25,28,29,31,33,36,38-42].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 12

Authors
Mendible-Barreto, O. A., Díaz-Maldonado, M., Carmona Esteva, F. J., Torres, J. E., Córdova-Figueroa, U. M., & Colón, Y. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Puerto Rico System (PR)
  • Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, 46556, USA
  • Merrimack College (US)
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Universidad de Puerto Rico, Mayagüez, PR, 00680, USA
Corresponding author
Colón, Yamil J.
Venue
Molecular Systems Design & Engineering
Published
2025
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
585-598
ISSN
2058-9689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410598591
Cited by
12
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 1
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Molecular Systems Design & Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Notre Dame
  • U.S. Department of Education (P200A210048)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
Keywords
large language models, AI agents, research workflow automation, LLM agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review