Cited by 57Electron Spin Resonance StudiesChemical Reaction MechanismsFree Radicals and Antioxidants

‘Inverted spin trapping’. Reactions between the radical cation of α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone and ionic and neutral nucleophiles

Eberson, Lennart·1992·J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2

Abstract

Tris(4-bromophenyl)aminium ion, TBPA˙+, is both an efficient electron transfer oxidant and an electrophile. Its reactivity toward nucleophiles reflects this dichotomy, in that bond formation occurs with nucleophiles that are not readily oxidized, such as carboxylate, cyanide and chloride ion, whereas less oxidation-resistant nucleophiles, such as bromide, iodide and trinitromethanide ion react with electron transfer.This property has been utilized to study spin-trapping reactions with α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) under oxidative conditions. The reaction between TBPA˙+ and a solution of PBN and nucleophile gave the corresponding spin adducts from both categories of nucleophiles, provided the nucleophilic/solvolytic reactivity of the spin adduct was not too high. Spin adducts from the oxidation-resistant nucleophiles [F–, CN–, CNO–, pyridine(s), succinimidate(s), triethyl phosphite, RCO2–] must then be formed in the reaction between the nucleophile and the radical cation of PBN, generated in an initial electron-transfer step (‘inverted spin trapping’). Only in the case of the more easily oxidizable nucleophiles [SCN–, (NO2)3C–, N3–] does proper spin trapping occur, i.e., the radical is formed by the TBPA˙+/nucleophile reaction and is then trapped by PBN.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/p29920001807

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In inverted spin trapping, a spin trapping agent is oxidized to form a radical cation and then attacked by a nucleophile to form a spin adduct.

    “In the inverted spin trapping mechanism, a spin trapping agent is oxidized to form a radical cation and then it is attacked by a nucleophile to form a spin adduct (Scheme 5) [21].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eberson, L.
Corresponding author
Eberson, Lennart
Venue
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
Published
1992
Issue
10
Pages
1807-1813
ISSN
  • 0300-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-5471
OpenAlex
W2021872779
Cited by
57
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2 (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Vetenskapsrådet
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
Keywords
N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone, radical cations, electron transfer, spin adducts, nucleophilicity, oxidation resistance, spin trapping, radical formation, carboxylate, cyanide, thiocyanate, bromide, iodide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review