‘Inverted spin trapping’. Reactions between the radical cation of α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone and ionic and neutral nucleophiles
Abstract
Tris(4-bromophenyl)aminium ion, TBPA˙+, is both an efficient electron transfer oxidant and an electrophile. Its reactivity toward nucleophiles reflects this dichotomy, in that bond formation occurs with nucleophiles that are not readily oxidized, such as carboxylate, cyanide and chloride ion, whereas less oxidation-resistant nucleophiles, such as bromide, iodide and trinitromethanide ion react with electron transfer.This property has been utilized to study spin-trapping reactions with α-phenyl-N-tert-butylnitrone (PBN) under oxidative conditions. The reaction between TBPA˙+ and a solution of PBN and nucleophile gave the corresponding spin adducts from both categories of nucleophiles, provided the nucleophilic/solvolytic reactivity of the spin adduct was not too high. Spin adducts from the oxidation-resistant nucleophiles [F–, CN–, CNO–, pyridine(s), succinimidate(s), triethyl phosphite, RCO2–] must then be formed in the reaction between the nucleophile and the radical cation of PBN, generated in an initial electron-transfer step (‘inverted spin trapping’). Only in the case of the more easily oxidizable nucleophiles [SCN–, (NO2)3C–, N3–] does proper spin trapping occur, i.e., the radical is formed by the TBPA˙+/nucleophile reaction and is then trapped by PBN.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In inverted spin trapping, a spin trapping agent is oxidized to form a radical cation and then attacked by a nucleophile to form a spin adduct.
“In the inverted spin trapping mechanism, a spin trapping agent is oxidized to form a radical cation and then it is attacked by a nucleophile to form a spin adduct (Scheme 5) [21].”
From Deciphering mechanism of excited state reactivity by spectroscopic methods (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Nucleophilic reactivity constants toward methyl iodide and trans-dichlorodi(pyridine)platinum(II)
Pearson, R. G., Sobel, H. R., & Songstad, J. (1968) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01004a021 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deciphering mechanism of excited state reactivity by spectroscopic methods
Rakhimov, S. A., Forbes, M. D. E., & Sivaguru, J. (2023) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1016/j.jpap.2023.100207 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eberson, L.
- Corresponding author
- Eberson, Lennart
- Venue
- J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2
- Publisher
- Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
- Published
- 1992
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1807-1813
- ISSN
- 0300-9580 (ISSN-L)
- 1364-5471
- OpenAlex
- W2021872779
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 2 (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electron Spin Resonance Studies
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Free Radicals and Antioxidants
- Keywords
- N-tert-butyl-alpha-phenylnitrone, radical cations, electron transfer, spin adducts, nucleophilicity, oxidation resistance, spin trapping, radical formation, carboxylate, cyanide, thiocyanate, bromide, iodide
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review