Looking for life elsewhere: Photosynthesis and astrobiology
Open accessAbstract
Photosynthesis produces signs of life we can see from space: the absorbance spectrum of surface photosynthetic pigments and, with oxygenic photosynthesis, atmospheric oxygen. Since the first discovery of a planet in another solar system in 1989, there has been an explosion in the detection of exoplanets (over 1849 as of 7 November 2014) and we are getting ever closer to finding that Goldilocks planet that might harbour life. With telescope observations of these planets, oxygenic photosynthesis has been considered our most robust target ‘biosignature’ that would not appear on a lifeless planet. Since anoxygenic photosynthetic organisms do not produce unambiguously biogenic gases, there is interest in their pigments serving as spectral indicators of life. But will they look the same as on Earth, can we distinguish them from the abiotic, and what will dominate on another planet? Examples from Earth provide us with the potential to extrapolate some rules for photosynthesis to predict its signature on another planet, but there are yet things we must answer about life here to improve our confidence. In particular, given the combination of the available stellar spectrum and molecular constraints on photon energy use, can we predict the pigment spectral features that will dominate, which reductant will match, and what biogenic gases would result? We take clues from the diversity of anoxygenic photosynthetic metabolisms and three very recent examples of oxygenic photosynthesis utilizing other reaction centre (RC) chlorophylls in addition to chlorophyll a (Chl a).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oxygenic photosynthesis would have a significant evolutionary advantage, allowing it to dominate its planetary surface environment, which in turn would make it more detectable on a planetary scale.
“oxygenic photosynthesis would have a significant evolutionary advantage, allowing it to dominate its planetary surface environment (Kiang et al., 2007b; Léger et al., 2011; Kiang, 2014), which in turn would make it more detectable on a planetary scale”
From Reflections on O <sub>2</sub> as a Biosignature in Exoplanetary Atmospheres (2017) · cites this paper as Kiang, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis
Youvan, D. C., & Marrs, B. L. (1987) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0687-42 · Cited by 845 · see citing works
Ke, B.: Photosynthesis. Photobiochemistry and Photobiophysics
Šesták, Z. (2002) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1023/a:1021378631517 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 3 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Allakhverdiev, S.I., Tomo, T., Shimada, Y., Kindo, H., Nagao, R., Klimov, V.V. and Mimuro, M. (2010) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 3924-3929
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reflections on O <sub>2</sub> as a Biosignature in Exoplanetary Atmospheres
Meadows, V. S. (2017) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2016.1578 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions
Walker, S. I., Bains, W., Cronin, L., DasSarma, S., Danielache, S. O., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Kaçar, B., Kiang, N. Y.-L., Lenardic, A., Reinhard, C. T., et al. (2018) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1738 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationAn Overview of Exoplanet Biosignatures
Schwieterman, E. W., & Leung, M. (2024) · Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · doi:10.2138/rmg.2024.90.13 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Surface and Temporal Biosignatures
Schwieterman, E. W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55333-7_69 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Optimizing photosynthetic light-harvesting under stars: simple and general antenna models
Chitnavis, S., Gray, C., Rousouli, I., Gillen, E., Mullineaux, C. W., Haworth, T. J., & Duffy, C. D. P. (2024) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-024-01118-1 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Surface and Temporal Biosignatures
Schwieterman, E. W. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30648-3_69-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Mousavi, F. (2023) · Technology in Aerospace Engineering · doi:10.30699/jtae.2023.7.2.5
- Authors
- Kiang, N. Y.
- Affiliations
- Goddard Institute for Space Studies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kiang, Nancy Y.
- ORCID
- Kiang, Nancy Y.
- Venue
- The Biochemist
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 2014-12-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 24-30
- ISSN
- 0954-982X (ISSN-L)
- 1740-1194
- OpenAlex
- W2980015968
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Biochemist (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Keywords
- photosynthesis, astrobiology, biosignatures, exoplanets, anoxygenic photosynthesis, oxygenic photosynthesis, photosynthetic pigments, chlorophyll, reaction center, atmospheric oxygen, exoplanet atmospheres, reducing agents, stellar spectra
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review