The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degradation of protein disulphide bonds in dilute alkali
Open accessAbstract
The degradation of S–S bonds in 0.2 M-NaOH at 25 degrees C was studied for a series of proteins and simple aliphatic disulphide compounds, by using cathodic stripping voltammetry, ion-selective-electrode potentiometry, spectrophotometry and ultrafiltration. The disulphide bonds that dissociated in 0.2 M-NaOH were usually those that are solvent accessible and that can be reduced by mild chemical reductants. Some unexpected differences were found between similar proteins, both in the number of S–S bonds dissociated and in their rates of decomposition. Chymotrypsin has one S–S bond attacked, whereas chymotrypsinogen and trypsinogen have two. Ribonuclease A has two S–S bonds dissociated, but ribonuclease S and S-protein have three. Denaturation in 6 M-guanidine hydrochloride before alkaline digestion caused the loss of an additional S–S bond in ribonuclease A and insulin, and increased the rate of dissociation of the S–S bonds of some other proteins. The initial product of S–S bond dissociation in dilute alkali is believed to be a persulphide intermediate formed by a beta-elimination reaction. This intermediate is in mobile equilibrium with bisulphide ion, HS-, and decomposes at a mercury electrode or in acid solution to yield a stoichiometric amount of sulphide. Rate constants and equilibrium constants were measured for the equilibria between HS- and the intermediates involved in the alkaline dissociation of several proteins. Elemental sulphur was not detected in any of the protein digests. It is suggested that formation of HS- from a persulphide intermediate involves a hydrolysis reaction to yield a sulphenic acid derivative. The small polypeptides glutathione and oxytocin gave only a low yield of persulphide, and their alkaline decomposition must proceed by a mechanism different from that of the proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stability of Protein Pharmaceuticals
Manning, M. C., Patel, K., & Borchardt, R. T. (1989) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1015929109894 · Cited by 1,078
Chemical Biology of H2S Signaling through Persulfidation
Filipovic, M. R., Zivanovic, J., Alvarez, B., & Banerjee, R. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00205 · Cited by 1,046
Heterogeneity of Monoclonal Antibodies
Liu, H., Gaza-Bulseco, G., Faldu, D., Chumsae, C., & Sun, J. (2008) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1002/jps.21180 · Cited by 481
The Role of Thiols and Disulfides on Protein Stability
Trivedi, M., Laurence, J., & Siahaan, T. (2009) · Current Protein & Peptide Science · doi:10.2174/138920309789630534 · Cited by 406
Redox Signaling by Reactive Electrophiles and Oxidants
Parvez, S., Long, M. J. C., Poganik, J. R., & Aye, Y. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00698 · Cited by 359
Metadata
- Authors
- Florence, T. M.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1980-09-01
- Volume
- 189
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-520
- ISSN
- 0264-6021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W155302766
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Degradation of protein disulphide bonds in dilute alkali. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bj1890507
- The paper
- Florence, T. M. (1980). Degradation of protein disulphide bonds in dilute alkali. Biochemical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj1890507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.