The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interaction of a 39 kDa protein with the low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-related protein (LRP) on rat hepatoma cells
Abstract
We have recently described a PAI-1-independent pathway of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) uptake and degradation on the rat MH1C1 hepatoma cell line. Further studies have implicated the low-density-lipoprotein-receptor-related protein (LRP) as the mediator of plasminogen-activator inhibitor type-1-independent t-PA endocytosis. The LRP is a multi-functional receptor which is shared by a variety of ligands, including alpha 2-macroglobulin, apoprotein E-enriched beta-very-low-density lipoprotein, t-PA and Pseudomonas exotoxin A. In each case, binding of ligand to this receptor can be inhibited by addition of the 39 kDa LRP-receptor-associated protein. This protein, which co-purifies with the LRP receptor, is the focus of our present study. 125I-labelled 39 kDa protein binds specifically and with high affinity to a single kinetic binding species on the rat MH1C1 cell surface. Scatchard analysis reveals an equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd) of 3.3 +/- 0.9 (S.D.) nM, with 380,000 +/- 190,000 (S.D.) binding sites per cell. Cross-linking studies indicate that the specific interaction between MH1C1 cells and the 39 kDa protein is mediated by an association with the LRP receptor. The 39 kDa protein strongly inhibits binding of 125I-t-PA, with an apparent Ki value of 0.5 nM. In addition, both unlabelled t-PA and 125I-labelled 39 kDa protein can be co-bound and cross-linked to the same cell-associated LRP receptor. Endocytosis of cell-surface-associated 39 kDa protein was shown to be rapid, with internalized ligand subsequently degraded and released to the extracellular milieu. The rate of uptake and degradation of 125I-labelled 39 kDa protein at 37 degrees C was determined to be 52 fmol/min per 10(6) cells, and supports a model for active recycling of the LRP receptor.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RAP binds LRP with affinity 3.3 nM and LDLR with Kd 250 nM.
“The binding affinity of RAP for LRP is 3.3 nM (46), whereas the K d of RAP for the LDLR is 250 nM (47)”
From Apolipoprotein E Receptors Mediate the Effects of β-Amyloid on Astrocyte Cultures (2000) · cites this paper as [46]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Microglia Mediate the Clearance of Soluble Aβ through Fluid Phase Macropinocytosis
Mandrekar, S., Jiang, Q., Lee, C. Y. D., Koenigsknecht-Talboo, J., Holtzman, D. M., & Landreth, G. E. (2009) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5572-08.2009 · Cited by 415
Ye, S., Huang, Y., Müllendorff, K., Dong, L., Giedt, G., Meng, E. C., Cohen, F. E., Kuntz, I. D., Weisgraber, K. H., & Mahley, R. W. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0508693102 · Cited by 275
Apolipoprotein E Receptors Mediate the Effects of β-Amyloid on Astrocyte Cultures
LaDu, M. J., Shah, J. A., Reardon, C. A., Getz, G. S., Bu, G., Hu, J., Guo, L., & Van Eldik, L. J. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m000602200 · Cited by 103
Self-citationMesd binds to mature LDL-receptor-related protein-6 and antagonizes ligand binding
Li, Y., Chen, J., Lu, W., McCormick, L. M., Wang, J., & Bu, G. (2005) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.02651 · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Iadonato, S. P., Bu, G., Maksymovitch, E. A., & Schwartz, A. L.
- Venue
- Biochemical Journal
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1993-12-15
- Volume
- 296
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 867-875
- ISSN
- 0264-6021
- 1470-8728
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review