The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The antioxidant hypothesis of cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and mechanisms
Abstract
Summary Plasma levels of major essential antioxidants were determined in representative random samples of middleaged men from 16 European study populations which differed up to 6-fold in age-specific mortality from ischaemic heart disease (IHD). In 12 study populations having total plasma cholesterol in the medium range (5.7–6.2 mmol/1) and usual blood pressure, both these classical risk factors lacked a significant correlation to IHD mortality, whereas the absolute level of vitamin E (α-tocopherol) showed a strong inverse correlation (r2 = 0.63, P = 0.002). On evaluation of all study populations, cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure had a moderate direct association with IHD, but their importance still remained inferior to that of vitamin E as an inversely associated, presumably protective factor. In stepwise regression and multiple regression analysis, the IHD mortality of the study populations was predictable to 62% by lipid-standardized vitamin E, to 79% by vitamin E and total cholesterol, to 83% after inclusion of lipid-standardized vitamin A (retinol) and to 87% by all the above parameters plus diastolic blood pressure. In conclusion, in the present study the plasma status of vitamin E is the most important factor to explain cross-cultural differences of IHD mortality. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis of the prevention of arteriosclerosis by antioxidant protection against peroxidative lipoprotein modification, but does not exclude additional effects of antioxidant vitamins, e.g. on the cellular or immunological level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema
Ciulla, T. A., Amador, A. G., & Zinman, B. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653 · Cited by 836
LI, H., CHENG, K., WONG, C., FAN, K., CHEN, F., & JIANG, Y. (2007) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.06.022 · Cited by 790
New developments and novel therapeutic perspectives for vitamin C
Li, Y., & Schellhorn, H. E. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.10.2171 · Cited by 508
Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Antioxidants in Edible Wild Plants
SIMOPOULOS, A. P. (2004) · Biological Research · doi:10.4067/s0716-97602004000200013 · Cited by 355
Klopotek, Y., Otto, K., & Böhm, V. (2005) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf047947v · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- GEY, K. F.
- Venue
- Biochemical Society Transactions
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1990-12-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1041-1045
- ISSN
- 0300-5127 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8752
- OpenAlex
- W54013240
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The antioxidant hypothesis of cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and mechanisms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/bst0181041
- The paper
- GEY, K. F. (1990). The antioxidant hypothesis of cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and mechanisms. Biochemical Society Transactions. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0181041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.