Cited by 422

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEA®s): stable and recyclable biocatalysts

Sheldon, R.A.·2007·Biochemical Society Transactions

Abstract

The key to obtaining an optimum performance of an enzyme is often a question of devising an effective method for its immobilization. In the present review, we describe a novel, versatile and effective methodology for enzyme immobilization as CLEAs (cross-linked enzyme aggregates). The method is exquisitely simple (involving precipitation of the enzyme from aqueous buffer followed by cross-linking of the resulting physical aggregates of enzyme molecules) and amenable to rapid optimization. We have shown it to be applicable to a wide variety of enzymes, including, in addition to a wide variety of hydrolases, lyases, e.g. nitrile hydratases and oxynitrilases, and oxidoreductases such as laccase and galactose oxidase. CLEAs are stable, recyclable catalysts exhibiting high catalyst productivities. Because the methodology is essentially a combination of purification and immobilization into one step, the enzyme does not need to be of high purity. The technique is also applicable to the preparation of combi-CLEAs, containing two or more enzymes, for use in one-pot, multistep syntheses, e.g. an oxynitrilase/nitrilase combi-CLEA for the one-pot conversion of benzaldehyde into (S)-mandelic acid, in high yield and enantiomeric purity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/bst0351583

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Sheldon, 2000, Pure Appl. Chem., 72, 1233, 10.1351/pac200072071233 · DOI
  2. Cao, 2003, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 14, 387, 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00096-X · DOI
  3. St. Clair, 1992, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 7314, 10.1021/ja00044a064 · DOI
  4. Margolin, 1996, Trends Biotechnol., 14, 223, 10.1016/0167-7799(96)10031-7 · DOI
  5. Lalonde, 1997, Chemtech, 27, 38
  6. Margolin, 2001, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 40, 2204, 10.1002/1521-3773(20010618)40:12<2204::AID-ANIE2204>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  7. Brown, 1966, Chem. Eng. Sci., 47, 1831
  8. Cao, 2000, Org. Lett., 2, 1361, 10.1021/ol005593x · DOI
  9. Cao, 2001, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 11, 665, 10.1016/S1381-1177(00)00078-3 · DOI
  10. Wegman, 2001, Adv. Synth. Catal., 343, 559, 10.1002/1615-4169(200108)343:6/7<559::AID-ADSC559>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI
  11. van Langen, 2003, Adv. Synth. Catal., 345, 797, 10.1002/adsc.200303023 · DOI
  12. Lopez-Serrano, 2002, Biotechnol. Lett., 24, 1379, 10.1023/A:1019863314646 · DOI
  13. Theil, 2000, Tetrahedron, 56, 2905, 10.1016/S0040-4020(00)00041-7 · DOI
  14. Schoevaart, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 87, 754, 10.1002/bit.20184 · DOI
  15. Yu, 2006, J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 43, 124, 10.1016/j.molcatb.2006.07.001 · DOI
  16. Hobbs, 2006, Green Chem., 8, 816, 10.1039/B604738F · DOI
  17. Dijkstra, 2007, J. Supercritical Fluids, 41, 102, 10.1016/j.supflu.2006.08.013 · DOI
  18. Ruiz Toral, 2007, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40, 1095, 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.08.027 · DOI
  19. Mateo, 2004, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 86, 273, 10.1002/bit.20033 · DOI
  20. Sheldon, 2005, Biocat. Biotrans., 23, 141, 10.1080/10242420500183378 · DOI
  21. Sheldon, 2007, Chim. Oggi, 25, 48
  22. Miyazawa, 1999, Amino Acids, 16, 191, 10.1007/BF01388169 · DOI
  23. van Rantwijk, 2004, Tetrahedron, 60, 501, 10.1016/j.tet.2003.10.018 · DOI
  24. Zhang, 1996, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 19, 538, 10.1016/S0141-0229(96)00057-9 · DOI
  25. Bode, 2003, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 84, 710, 10.1002/bit.10828 · DOI
  26. O'Connel, 2006, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 134, 179, 10.1385/ABAB:134:2:179 · DOI
  27. Wilson, 2004, Biomacromolecules, 5, 814, 10.1021/bm034528i · DOI
  28. van Langen, 2005, Org. Lett., 7, 327, 10.1021/ol047647z · DOI
  29. Cabirol, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1645, 10.1002/adsc.200606139 · DOI
  30. Chmura, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 1655, 10.1002/adsc.200606140 · DOI
  31. Roberge, 2007, Tetrahedron Lett., 48, 1473, 10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.12.053 · DOI
  32. DiCosimo, 2006, Biocatalysis in the Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Industries, 1
  33. Bruggink, 2003, Org. Proc. Res. Dev., 7, 622, 10.1021/op0340311 · DOI
  34. Mateo, 2006, Tetrahedron Asymm., 17, 320, 10.1016/j.tetasy.2006.01.020 · DOI
  35. Honda, 2006, Adv. Synth. Catal., 348, 2163, 10.1002/adsc.200606224 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 422

Metadata

Authors
Sheldon, R. A.
Venue
Biochemical Society Transactions
Published
2007-11-23
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1583-1587
ISSN
  • 0300-5127
  • 1470-8752
Cited by
422
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review