Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 289

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Physiology and Pathophysiology of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Variability in Humans: Is Power Spectral Analysis Largely An Index of Baroreflex Gain?

Sleight, Peter, La Rovere, Maria Teresa, Mortara, Andrea, Pinna, Gianni, Maestri, Roberto, Leuzzi, Stefano, Bianchini, Beatrice, Tavazzi, Luigi, Bernardi, Luciano·1995·Clinical Science

Abstract

1. It is often assumed that the power in the low-(around 0.10 Hz) and high-frequency (around 0.25 Hz) bands obtained by power spectral analysis of cardiovascular variables reflects vagal and sympathetic tone respectively. An alternative model attributes the low-frequency band to a resonance in the control system that is produced by the inefficiently slow time constant of the reflex response to beat-to-beat changes in blood pressure effected by the sympathetic (with or without the parasympathetic) arm(s) of the baroreflex (De Boer model). 2. We have applied the De Boer model of circulatory variability to patients with varying baroreflex sensitivity and one normal subject, and have shown that the main differences in spectral power (for both low and high frequency) between and within subjects are caused by changes in the arterial baroreflex gain, particularly for vagal control of heart rate (R—R interval) and left ventricular stroke output. We have computed the power spectrum at rest and during neck suction (to stimulate carotid baroreceptors). We stimulated the baroreceptors at two frequencies (0.1 and 0.2 Hz), which were both distinct from the controlled respiration rate (0.25 Hz), in both normal subjects and heart failure patients with either sensitive or poor baroreflex control. 3. The data broadly confirm the De Boer model. The low-frequency (0.1 Hz) peak in either R—R or blood pressure variability) was spontaneously generated only if the baroreflex control of the autonomic outflow was relatively intact. With a large stimulus to the carotid baroreceptor it was possible to influence the low-frequency R—R but not low-frequency blood pressure variability. This implies that it is too simplistic to use power spectral analysis as a simple measure of autonomic balance its underlying modulation is more complex than generally believed. 4. It may be that power spectral analysis is more a sensitive indicator of baroreflex control, particularly of vagal control, than direct evidence of autonomic balance. of course, there is often a correlation between the gain of the reflex and the autonomic balance of vagus and sympathetic. These considerations may help our understanding of some conditions, such as exercise or heart failure, when the power spectral analysis method fails to identify increased sympathetic discharge; this failure may partly be explained by the decrease in baroreflex sensitivity which occurs in these two conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs0880103

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 289

Metadata

Authors
Sleight, P., La Rovere, M. T., Mortara, A., Pinna, G., Maestri, R., Leuzzi, S., Bianchini, B., Tavazzi, L., & Bernardi, L.
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
103-109
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W82976667
Cited by
289
References
0
FWCI
12.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiology and Pathophysiology of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Variability in Humans: Is Power Spectral Analysis Largely An Index of Baroreflex Gain? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1042/cs0880103
The paper
Sleight, P., La Rovere, M. T., Mortara, A., Pinna, G., Maestri, R., Leuzzi, S., Bianchini, B., Tavazzi, L., & Bernardi, L. (1995). Physiology and Pathophysiology of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Variability in Humans: Is Power Spectral Analysis Largely An Index of Baroreflex Gain? Clinical Science. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0880103

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.