The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neutrophil Priming: Pathophysiological Consequences and Underlying Mechanisms
Abstract
1. Neutrophil priming by agents such as tumour necrosis factor-α, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor and lipopolysaccharide causes a dramatic increase in the response of these cells to an activating agent; this process has been shown to be critical for neutrophil-mediated tissue injury both in vitro and in vivo. 2. The principle consequence of priming, aside from a direct effect on cell polarization, deformability and integrin/selectin expression, is to permit secretagogue-induced superoxide anion generation, degranulation and lipid mediator (e.g. leukotriene B4 and arachidonic acid) release. It is now recognized that most priming agents also serve an additional function of delaying apoptosis and hence increasing the functional longevity of these cells at the inflamed site. 3. The potential mechanisms underlying priming are discussed; current data suggest a dissociation between priming and changes in receptor number and/or affinity, G-protein expression, phospholipase C and phospholipase A2 activation and changes in intracellular Ca2+ concentration. However, more recent studies support a key role for protein tyrosine phosphorylation and enhanced phospholipase D and phosphoinositide 3-kinase activity in neutrophil priming. 4. Recent work has also revealed the potential for neutrophils to spontaneously and fully ‘de-prime’ after an initial challenge with platelet-activating factor. This ability of neutrophils to undergo a complete cycle of priming—de-priming (and re-priming) reveals a previously unrecognized flexibility in the control of neutrophil behaviour at an inflamed site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berkow, R. L., Wang, D., Larrick, J. W., Dodson, R. W., & Howard, T. H. (1987) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.139.11.3783 · Cited by 295
Cited by
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Priming of the neutrophil respiratory burst: role in host defense and inflammation
El‐Benna, J., Hurtado‐Nedelec, M., Marzaioli, V., Marie, J., Gougerot‐Pocidalo, M., & Dang, P. M. (2016) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/imr.12447 · Cited by 478
McLeish, K. R., Uriarte, S. M., Tandon, S., Creed, T. M., Le, J., & Ward, R. A. (2013) · Journal of Innate Immunity · doi:10.1159/000345992 · Cited by 32
Novel Assay To Characterize Neutrophil Responses to Oral Biofilms
Oveisi, M., Shifman, H., Fine, N., Sun, C., Glogauer, N., Senadheera, D., & Glogauer, M. (2019) · Infection and Immunity · doi:10.1128/iai.00790-18 · Cited by 30
Paloschi, M. V., Boeno, C. N., Lopes, J. A., Rego, C. M. A., Silva, M. D. S., Santana, H. M., Serrath, S. N., Ikenohuchi, Y. J., Farias, B. J. C., Felipin, K. P., et al. (2022) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2022.120962 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Condliffe, A. M., Kitchen, E., & Chilvers, E. R.
- Venue
- Clinical Science
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 461-471
- ISSN
- 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8736
- OpenAlex
- W1631483568
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.