The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Skeletal Progenitor Cells and Ageing Human Populations
Abstract
1. Stem and progenitor cells present within bone marrow give rise to colony forming units-fibroblastic (CFU-F) which can differentiate into fibroblastic, osteogenic, myogenic, adipogenic and reticular cells. The decrease in skeletal bone formation and rate of fracture repair observed with ageing and in osteoporosis has been suggested to be due to a decrease in numbers of these progenitors, but human studies are limited. 2. We have tested the potential to form CFU-F in a total of 99 patients undergoing corrective surgery (16 controls, 14–48 years of age) or hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis (57 patients, 28–87 years of age) or osteoporosis (26 patients, 69–97 years of age). Total colony number, alkaline phosphatase-positive colony number and colony size were determined. 3. No decrease in colony forming efficiency under the culture conditions used was observed in all populations examined irrespective of age, disease or gender, as determined by the lack of correlation between colony formation and age. 3. Examination of colony sizes showed a significant reduction in colony size with age in osteoarthritis and in control populations indicating a change in cellular proliferative potential with age. 4. Examination of number and percentage of alkaline phosphatase-positive CFU-F showed a significant decrease in osteoporotic patients compared with controls and osteoarthritis patients, indicating altered differentiation potential. 5. These results suggest that the reduction in bone mass with ageing may be due to reduction of the proliferative capacity of progenitor cells or their responsiveness to biological factors leading to alteration in subsequent differentiation. The maintenance of CFU-F number and alkaline phosphatase activity in these osteoarthritis patients may, in part, explain the inverse relationship observed for the preservation of bone mass between generalized osteoarthritis and primary osteoporosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
Quantum concept of bone remodeling and turnover: Implications for the pathogenesis of osteoporosis
Parfitt, A. M. (1979) · Calcified Tissue International · doi:10.1007/bf02441211 · Cited by 275
Cited by
Bone Quality — The Material and Structural Basis of Bone Strength and Fragility
Seeman, E., & Delmas, P. D. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra053077 · Cited by 2,080
Stenderup, K. (2003) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2003.07.005 · Cited by 1,206
Stolzing, A., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., & Scutt, A. (2008) · Mechanisms of Ageing and Development · doi:10.1016/j.mad.2007.12.002 · Cited by 1,195
Zhou, S., Greenberger, J. S., Epperly, M. W., Goff, J. P., Adler, C., LeBoff, M. S., & Glowacki, J. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x · Cited by 785
Aging of mesenchymal stem cells
SETHE, S., SCUTT, A., & STOLZING, A. (2006) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2005.10.001 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Oreffo, R. O. C., Bord, S., & Triffitt, J. T.
- Venue
- Clinical Science
- Publisher
- Portland Press Ltd.
- Published
- 1998-05-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 549-555
- ISSN
- 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-8736
- OpenAlex
- W128190313
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.