Cited by 1,195Mesenchymal stem cell researchTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Age-related changes in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Consequences for cell therapies

Open access
Stolzing, A., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., Scutt, A.·2008·Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Abstract

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) represent a promising cell-based therapy for a number of degenerative conditions. Understanding the effect of aging on hMSCs is crucial for autologous therapy development in older subject whom degenerative diseases typically afflict. Previous investigations into the effects of aging on hMSC have proved contradictory due to the relative narrow age ranges of subjects assessed and the exclusive reliance of in vitro assays. This study seeks to address this controversy by using a wider range of donor ages and by measuring indices of cellular aging as well as hMSC numbers ex vivo and proliferation rates. CFU-f analysis and flow cytometry analysis using a CD45(low)/D7fib(+ve)/LNGF(+ve) gating strategy were employed. In addition a variety of markers of cellular aging, oxidative damage and senescence measured. A reduction in CFU-f and CD45(low)/D7fib(+ve)/LNGF(+ve) cell numbers were noted in adulthood relative to childhood. Indices of aging including oxidative damage, ROS levels and p21 and p53 all increased suggesting a loss of MSC fitness with age. These data suggest that hMSC numbers obtained by marrow aspiration decline with age. Furthermore, there is an age-related decline in overall BM MSC "fitness" which might lead to problems when using autologous aged MSC for cell-based therapies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mad.2007.12.002

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stolzing, A., Jones, E., McGonagle, D., & Scutt, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Stolzing, A.
Venue
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
129
Issue
3
Pages
163-173
ISSN
0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089878334
Cited by
1,195
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 72
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, bone marrow, aging, cellular senescence, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, p21, p53, CFU-F, autologous cell therapy, degenerative diseases, donor age
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteogenesis, Phenotype, Biomarkers, Cellular Senescence, Apoptosis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Cell Proliferation, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review