Cited by 27Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusBarrier Structure and Function StudiesIon Transport and Channel Regulation

The perivascular pathways for influx of cerebrospinal fluid are most efficient in the midbrain

Dobson, Howard, Sharp, Matthew MacGregor, Cumpsty, Richard, Criswell, Theodore P., Wellman, Tyler, Finucane, Ciara, Sullivan, Jenna M., Weller, Roy O. +2 more·2017·Clinical Science

Abstract

Although there are no conventional lymphatic vessels in the brain, fluid and solutes drain along basement membranes (BMs) of cerebral capillaries and arteries towards the subarachnoid space and cervical lymph nodes. Convective influx/glymphatic entry of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the brain parenchyma occurs along the pial-glial BMs of arteries. This project tested the hypotheses that pial-glial BM of arteries are thicker in the midbrain, allowing more glymphatic entry of CSF. The in vivo MRI and PET images were obtained from a 4.2-year-old dog, whereas the post-mortem electron microscopy was performed in a 12-year-old dog. We demonstrated a significant increase in the thickness of the pial-glial BM in the midbrain compared with the same BM in different regions of the brain and an increase in the convective influx of fluid from the subarachnoid space. These results are highly significant for the intrathecal drug delivery into the brain, indicating that the midbrain is better equipped for convective influx/glymphatic entry of the CSF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1042/cs20171265

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal studies have shown communication between the subarachnoid CSF space and perivascular compartments of the brain and spinal cord.

    “Previous animal studies have shown communication between the subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space and perivascular compartments of the brain (6-10) and spinal cord (11).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dobson, H., Sharp, M. M., Cumpsty, R., Criswell, T. P., Wellman, T., Finucane, C., Sullivan, J. M., Weller, R. O., Verma, A., & Carare, R. O.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Southampton General Hospital (GB)
  • Invicro (United States) (US)
  • Biogen (United States) (US)
Venue
Clinical Science
Published
2017-11-13
Volume
131
Issue
22
Pages
2745-2752
ISSN
  • 0143-5221 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-8736
OpenAlex
W2763721270
Cited by
27
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Southampton
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
Keywords
cerebrospinal fluid, glymphatic system, midbrain, basement membrane thickness, cerebral arteries, subarachnoid space, intrathecal drug delivery
MeSH terms
Animals, Arteries, Basement Membrane, Cerebrospinal Fluid, Dogs, Endothelium, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mesencephalon, Muscle, Smooth, Neuroglia, Pia Mater, Time Factors, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review