The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Voice Disorders in Teachers and the General Population: Effects on Work Performance, Attendance, and Future Career Choices
Abstract
To examine the frequency and adverse effects of voice disorders on job performance and attendance in teachers and the general population, 2,401 participants from Iowa and Utah ( n 1 =1,243 teachers and n 2 =1,279 nonteachers) were randomly selected and were interviewed by telephone using a voice disorder questionnaire. Teachers were significantly more likely than nonteachers to have experienced multiple voice symptoms and signs including hoarseness, discomfort, and increased effort while using their voice, tiring or experiencing a change in voice quality after short use, difficulty projecting their voice, trouble speaking or singing softly, and a loss of their singing range (all odds ratios [ORs] p <.05). Furthermore, teachers consistently attributed these voice symptoms to their occupation and were significantly more likely to indicate that their voice limited their ability to perform certain tasks at work, and had reduced activities or interactions as a result. Teachers, as compared with nonteachers, had missed more workdays over the preceding year because of voice problems and were more likely to consider changing occupations because of their voice (all comparisons p <.05). These findings strongly suggest that occupationally related voice dysfunction in teachers can have significant adverse effects on job performance, attendance, and future career choices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Approximate Distribution of Estimates of Variance Components
Satterthwaite, F. E. (1946) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3002019 · Cited by 4,373
Cited by
Voice Disorders in the General Population: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Occupational Impact
Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M. (2005) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000179174.32345.41 · Cited by 847
Self-citationRoy, N., Stemple, J., Merrill, R. M., & Thomas, L. (2007) · Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology · doi:10.1177/000348940711601112 · Cited by 326
Self-citationPrevalence and causes of dysphonia in a large treatment‐seeking population
Cohen, S. M., Kim, J., Roy, N., Asche, C., & Courey, M. (2012) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.22426 · Cited by 314
Self-citationVan Houtte, E., Claeys, S., Wuyts, F., & Van Lierde, K. (2011) · Journal of Voice · doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.04.008 · Cited by 290
The Prevalence and Risk Factors for Occupational Voice Disorders in Teachers
Sliwinska-Kowalska, M., Niebudek-Bogusz, E., Fiszer, M., Los-Spychalska, T., Kotylo, P., Sznurowska-Przygocka, B., & Modrzewska, M. (2006) · Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica · doi:10.1159/000089610 · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Thibeault, S., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 542-551
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- DOI
- 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/042
- OpenAlex
- W2047815315
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Voice Disorders in Teachers and the General Population: Effects on Work Performance, Attendance, and Future Career Choices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/042
- The paper
- Roy, N., Merrill, R. M., Thibeault, S., Gray, S. D., & Smith, E. M. (2004). Voice Disorders in Teachers and the General Population: Effects on Work Performance, Attendance, and Future Career Choices. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/042
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.