Cited by 11Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Recurrences in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Long-Term Observational Study

Pecorari, Giancarlo, Riva, Giuseppe, Bruno, Gabriele, Naqe, Nertila, Nardo, Matteo, Albera, Andrea, Albera, Roberto·2020·American Journal of Audiology

Abstract

Purpose Long-term outcomes of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) are poorly studied. The recurrence rate is heterogeneous, and the prognosis of relapses is uncertain. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the recurrence rate of SSNHL and to analyze the correlation with clinical and audiometric characteristics. Method Seventy-three patients with idiopatic SSNHL were evaluated. Clinical and audiometric features were recorded. Seventy patients (95.8%) had at least a 2-year follow-up, whereas 50 (68.4%) had a 5-year follow-up. Results Two- and 5-year recurrence rates were 5.60% and 10.34%, respectively. Mean time lapse between 1st episode and recurrence was 29.33 ± 26.60 months. About 70% of patients had a partial recovery at recurrence. The same ear was affected in 42.8% of patients, the contralateral ear was affected in 42.8% of patients, and recurrence was bilateral in 14.4% of cases. Recurrence correlated only with the presence of tinnitus during follow-up. However, the small number of participants with recurrence represented a limiting factor of our study. Conclusions Recurrences of SSNHL are rare events that can involve ipsilateral or contralateral ear. Further studies are necessary to identify predictors of recurrence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2019_aja-19-00061

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pecorari, G., Riva, G., Bruno, G., Naqe, N., Nardo, M., Albera, A., & Albera, R.
Affiliations
University of Turin (IT)
Venue
American Journal of Audiology
Published
2020-03-05
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
18-22
ISSN
  • 1059-0889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9137
OpenAlex
W2999038897
Cited by
11
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PORTO@Iris (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sudden sensorineural hearing loss, recurrence, relapse, idiopathic hearing loss, tinnitus, long-term outcomes, bilateral hearing loss, ipsilateral recurrence, predictors of recurrence
MeSH terms
Injection, Intratympanic, Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Betamethasone, Child, Hearing Loss, Sudden, Diuretics, Osmotic, Female, Glucocorticoids, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Hyperbaric Oxygenation, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mannitol, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Time Factors, Retreatment, Recovery of Function, Young Adult, Administration, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review