Cited by 20Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityLanguage Development and DisordersVoice and Speech Disorders

Speech-Language Pathologists' Feelings and Practices Regarding Technological Apps in School Service Delivery

Olszewski, Arnold, Smith, Erika, Franklin, Amber D.·2022·Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools

Abstract

Purpose Thousands of technological applications (apps) have emerged in the past decade, yet few studies have examined how apps are used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs), their effectiveness, and SLPs' feelings regarding their use. This study explored how SLPs use apps and their feelings regarding their use in schools, as well as considerations made by SLPs prior to implementing apps in therapy sessions. Method A survey was distributed electronically to school-based SLPs in Ohio, yielding 69 valid responses. The study probed SLP demographics, patterns of app use in schools, and feelings toward their use in a school setting. Results Results showed 77% of SLPs reported using apps in their treatment sessions and reported generally positive feelings regarding app use. SLPs considered factors such as age, cognitive ability, and treatment targets when using apps in treatment. SLPs who reported not using apps cited personal preference and price as the most common factors influencing their decision. SLPs also noted concerns about excessive screen time. Conclusions Results of this study carry clinical implications for future development and assessment of technology to be used for service delivery in schools. Given that the majority of school-based SLPs report using apps with their students, research on the role of apps in supporting learning for speech-language services is urgently needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/2022_lshss-21-00150

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olszewski, A., Smith, E., & Franklin, A. D.
Affiliations
Miami University (US)
Venue
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
Published
2022-10-06
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1051-1073
ISSN
  • 0161-1461 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9129
OpenAlex
W4289524213
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
FWCI
7.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
speech-language pathologists, mobile application, school-based speech-language services, clinician attitudes, screen time
MeSH terms
Pathologists, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Speech, Speech-Language Pathology, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review