Speech-Language Pathologists' Feelings and Practices Regarding Technological Apps in School Service Delivery
Abstract
Purpose Thousands of technological applications (apps) have emerged in the past decade, yet few studies have examined how apps are used by speech-language pathologists (SLPs), their effectiveness, and SLPs' feelings regarding their use. This study explored how SLPs use apps and their feelings regarding their use in schools, as well as considerations made by SLPs prior to implementing apps in therapy sessions. Method A survey was distributed electronically to school-based SLPs in Ohio, yielding 69 valid responses. The study probed SLP demographics, patterns of app use in schools, and feelings toward their use in a school setting. Results Results showed 77% of SLPs reported using apps in their treatment sessions and reported generally positive feelings regarding app use. SLPs considered factors such as age, cognitive ability, and treatment targets when using apps in treatment. SLPs who reported not using apps cited personal preference and price as the most common factors influencing their decision. SLPs also noted concerns about excessive screen time. Conclusions Results of this study carry clinical implications for future development and assessment of technology to be used for service delivery in schools. Given that the majority of school-based SLPs report using apps with their students, research on the role of apps in supporting learning for speech-language services is urgently needed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most speech-language clinicians use technology for planning, assessment, or intervention, including the use of apps in the school setting.
“Most speech-language clinicians use technology for planning, assessment, or intervention, including the use of apps in the school setting (Albudoor & Peña, 2021;Olszewski et al., 2022).”
From Equipping Speech-Language Clinicians for the Critical Appraisal of an Artificial Intelligence–Driven, Evidence-Based Future (2025) · cites this paper as Olszewski et al., 2022
Cites
Advancing the science of mHealth
Nilsen, W., Kumar, S., Shar, A., Varoquiers, C., Wiley, T., Riley, W. T., Pavel, M., & Atienza, A. A. (2012) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.677394 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Furlong, L., Morris, M., Serry, T., & Erickson, S. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0201513 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Be Smarter Than Your Phone: A Framework for Using Apps in Clinical Practice
Muñoz, M. L., Hoffman, L. M., & Brimo, D. (2013) · Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders · doi:10.1044/cicsd_40_f_138 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benway, N. R., & Preston, J. L. (2025) · Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools · doi:10.1044/2025_lshss-24-00085 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Carl, M., Rudyk, E., Shapira, Y., Rusiewicz, H. L., & Icht, M. (2024) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00009 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Olszewski, A., Smith, E., & Franklin, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Miami University (US)
- Venue
- Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools
- Published
- 2022-10-06
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1051-1073
- ISSN
- 0161-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9129
- OpenAlex
- W4289524213
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- speech-language pathologists, mobile application, school-based speech-language services, clinician attitudes, screen time
- MeSH terms
- Pathologists, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Schools, Speech, Speech-Language Pathology, Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review