Cited by 91Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Mobile apps for treatment of speech disorders in children: An evidence-based analysis of quality and efficacy

Open access
Furlong, Lisa, Morris, Meg, Serry, Tanya, Erickson, Shane·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently there has been exponential growth in mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) for children with speech disorders. A challenge for health professionals and families is knowing how to find high quality apps that are therapeutically beneficial. We systematically search and critique the quality of mobile apps for childhood speech disorders. An evidence-based method for identifying suitable apps in the Google Play and Apple iTunes stores is also proposed. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic search of the Google Play and Apple iTunes app stores was conducted from November 2016 to May 2017. Twelve pre-defined search terms were applied, identifying 5076 apps. Systematic screening resulted in 132 unique apps for full appraisal. These were appraised by two raters using the Mobile Application Rating scale. None were of excellent quality. Twenty-five were of good quality, 105 average and 2 were poor or very poor. DISCUSSION: It can be challenging for consumers to locate high quality speech therapy apps for children. Although we found more than 5000 apps, less than 3% met criteria for evaluation. Difficulties sourcing valid apps included: (i) Boolean operators were not available and therefore only one search term could be used each time (ii) the order of app listings in online stores continually changed (iii) apps were organised in online stores according to relevance and popularity (iv) there was no easy way to extract app titles and eliminate duplicates (v) app cost did not always correlate with therapeutic quality. CONCLUSIONS: The rapid growth of mHealth heightens the need to develop rigorous and efficient systems to search and retrieve apps and evaluate their therapeutic benefits. Given the difficulty accessing speech therapy services worldwide, mHealth promises therapy benefits when apps are reliable, valid and easily found.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0201513

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]McCormack J, McLeod S, Harrison LJ, McAllister L, Holliday EL. A different view of talking. ACQuiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing. 2010; 12(1): 10– 5.
  2. [9]Nordness AS, Beukelman DR. Speech practice patterns of children with speech sound disorders: The impact of parental record keeping and computer-led practice. (Report). Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology. 2010; 18(4): 104– 8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furlong, L., Morris, M., Serry, T., & Erickson, S.
Affiliations
La Trobe University (AU)
Corresponding author
Furlong, Lisa
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-08-09
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
e0201513
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2886759444
Cited by
87
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • La Trobe University (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
mobile health apps, speech therapy apps, speech disorders in children, Mobile App Rating Scale, app discovery
MeSH terms
Child, Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Speech Disorders, Speech Therapy, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review