The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Clinical Appraisal of the Pragmatic Aspects of Language
Abstract
A descriptive taxonomy, the pragmatic protocol, was developed for this study. The protocol consists of 30 pragmatic parameters of language. The purpose of the study was to test the utility of the tool to evaluate a range of pragmatic aspects of language in a sample of conversational speech fiom subjects in six groups. Among the disordered subjects, four distinct profiles emerged that separated the diagnostic groups. Individual differences in the way pragmatic deficits were distributed within a diagnostic category were also identified. The authors stress that the assessment of pragmatics should encompass a range of parameters that includes aspects of linguistic structure as well as those aspects of communication that have to do with principles governing language use. We offer our data as an early look at the way in which pragmatic deficits stratify across disordered populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grice, H. P. (1975) · Speech Acts · doi:10.1163/9789004368811_003 · Cited by 23,221
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Cited by
Bishop, D. V. M. (1998) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1017/s0021963098002832 · Cited by 758
Thiemann, K. S., & Goldstein, H. (2001) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-425 · Cited by 367
Purvis, K. L., & Tannock, R. (1997) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1025731529006 · Cited by 277
Cohen, N. J., Vallance, D. D., Barwick, M., Im, N., Menna, R., Horodezky, N. B., & Isaacson, L. (2000) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00619 · Cited by 272
Long-Term Consistency in Speech/Language Profiles: I. Developmental and Academic Outcomes
BEITCHMAN, J. H., WILSON, B., BROWNLIE, E. B., WALTERS, H., & LANCEE, W. (1996) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199606000-00021 · Cited by 219
Metadata
- Authors
- Prutting, C. A., & Kittchner, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-119
- ISSN
- 0022-4677 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-6184
- OpenAlex
- W2007830899
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Clinical Appraisal of the Pragmatic Aspects of Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshd.5202.105
- The paper
- Prutting, C. A., & Kittchner, D. M. (1987). A Clinical Appraisal of the Pragmatic Aspects of Language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5202.105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
