Cited by 121Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersReading and Literacy Development

Fricative Discrimination in Early Infancy

Eilers, Rebecca E., Minifie, Fred D.·1975·Journal of Speech and Hearing Research

Abstract

In three separate experiments using controlled natural stimuli and a high-amplitude sucking paradigm, infants' ability to detect differences between /s/ and /v/, /s/ and /∫/, and /s/ and /z/, respectively, was investigated. Evidence for discrimination was obtained for /s/ versus /v/ and /s/ versus /∫/ but not for /s/ versus /z/. Implications for a theory of infant speech perception are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/jshr.1801.158

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence has shown that infants can make virtually all of the consonantal discriminations that have been tested, including /va/ from /sa/ and /va/ from /oa/.

    “Furthermore, evidence has shown that infants can make virtually all of the consonantal discriminations that have been tested (Kuhl, 1987), including Ivai from Isal (Eilers & Minifie, 1975; Eilers, Wilson, & Moore, 1977) and Ivai from loal (Levitt, Jusczyk, Murray, & Carden, 1988).”

    From The McGurk effect in infants (1997) · cites this paper as Eilers & Minifie, 1975

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eilers, R. E., & Minifie, F. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
Published
1975-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
158-167
ISSN
0022-4685 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050517152
Cited by
121
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Speech and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
infant speech perception, early infancy, consonant discrimination, speech perception development
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Auditory Perception, Child Language, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Humans, Infant, Phonetics, Speech, Sucking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review