The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing II: Acoustic Characteristics of Clear and Conversational Speech
Abstract
The first paper of this series (Picheny, Durlach, & Braida, 1985) presented evidence that there are substantial intelligibility differences for hearing-impaired listeners between nonsense sentences spoken in a conversational manner and spoken with the effort to produce clear speech. In this paper, we report the results of acoustic analyses performed on the conversational and clear speech. Among these results are the following. First, speaking rate decreases substantially in clear speech. This decrease is achieved both by inserting pauses between words and by lengthening the durations of individual speech sounds. Second, there are differences between the two speaking modes in the numbers and types of phonological phenomena observed. In conversational speech, vowels are modified or reduced, and word-final stop bursts are often not released. In clear speech, vowels are modified to a lesser extent, and stop bursts, as well as essentially all word-final consonants, are released. Third, the RMS intensities for obstruent sounds, particularly stop consonants, is greater in clear speech than in conversational speech. Finally, changes in the long-term spectrum are small. Thus, speaking clearly cannot be regarded as equivalent to the application of high-frequency emphasis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review.
Mattys, S. L., Davis, M. H., Bradlow, A. R., & Scott, S. K. (2012) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006 · Cited by 809
Comparison of Two Forms of Intensive Speech Treatment for Parkinson Disease
Ramig, L. O., Countryman, S., Thompson, L. L., & Horii, Y. (1995) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.3806.1232 · Cited by 384
(2002) · doi:10.1515/9783110197105 · Cited by 371
Speaking Clearly for Children With Learning Disabilities: Sentence Perception in Noise
Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007 · Cited by 358
Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates
Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2004) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1635842 · Cited by 345
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 434-446
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W3045497008
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing II: Acoustic Characteristics of Clear and Conversational Speech. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshr.2904.434
- The paper
- Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking Clearly for the Hard of Hearing II: Acoustic Characteristics of Clear and Conversational Speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2904.434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.