The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Laboratory Phonology 7
Abstract
This collection of recent papers in Laboratory Phonology approaches phonological theory from several different empirical directions. Psycholinguistic research into the perception and production of speech has produced results that challenge current conceptions about phonological structure. Field work studies provide fresh insights into the structure of phonological features, and the phonology-phonetics interface is investigated in phonetic research involving both segments and prosody, while the role of underspecification is put to the test in automatic speech recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,136
Perception of the speech code.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020279 · Cited by 3,722
The TRACE model of speech perception
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 · Cited by 2,956
Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.
Goldinger, S. D. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.251 · Cited by 1,587
Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition
Norris, D. (1994) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4 · Cited by 1,250
Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants
Kuhl, P. K., Andruski, J. E., Chistovich, I. A., Chistovich, L. A., Kozhevnikova, E. V., Ryskina, V. L., Stolyarova, E. I., Sundberg, U., & Lacerda, F. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5326.684 · Cited by 1,041
Maddieson, I. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,037
The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.14.1.113 · Cited by 1,014
Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003241 · Cited by 761
Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jshr.2904.434 · Cited by 668
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition.
Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.115.2.357 · Cited by 686
Hyman, L. M. (2006) · Phonology · doi:10.1017/s0952675706000893 · Cited by 599
Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress
Hay, J., Warren, P., & Drager, K. (2006) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2005.10.001 · Cited by 585
A Usage-Based Approach to Spanish Verbs of ‘Becoming‘
Bybee, J., & Eddington, D. (2006) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.2006.0081 · Cited by 405
Metadata
- Publisher
- Mouton de Gruyter
- Published
- 2002-08-30
- OpenAlex
- W2671962773
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 9.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laboratory Phonology 7. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/9783110197105
- The paper
- Laboratory Phonology 7. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
