Cited by 64Dysphagia Assessment and ManagementVoice and Speech DisordersOropharyngeal Anatomy and Pathologies

The Relationship of Vallecular Residue to Oral Involvement, Reduced Hyoid Elevation, and Epiglottic Function

Perlman, A. L., Grayhack, J. P., Booth, B. M.·1992·Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to identify certain variables that may result in vallecular residue after swallowing. The relationship between vallecular residue and oral-stage dysphagia, reduced hyoid elevation, and movement of the epiglottis was assessed in 330 patients referred to the speech pathology section for evaluation of oropharyngeal swallowing function. Patients with vallecular residue were more likely to have oral involvement or deviant epiglottic function, characterized by an absence of epiglottic inversion or incomplete inversion, than patients without vallecular residue. Although the primary focus of the study was between vallecular residue and the other select variables, the interrelationships among the three other variables were also studied. Patients with deviant epiglottic function were more likely to have oral involvement, reduced hyoid elevation, or vallecular residue than patients without deviant epiglottic function and patients with reduced hyoid elevation were more likely to have oral involvement than those with normal hyoid elevation. Multivariate analysis revealed that the relationship between oral involvement and deviant epiglottic function, present in the bivariate analysis, was not significant when controlling for other relationships in the model. The relationship between primary medical diagnostic category and the presence/absence of vallecular residue as well as the other dichotomous variables varied between and within diagnostic categories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1044/jshr.3504.734

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perlman, A. L., Grayhack, J. P., & Booth, B. M.
Affiliations
Iowa City VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Published
1992-08
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
734-741
ISSN
  • 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9102
OpenAlex
W2093418673
Cited by
64
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Oropharyngeal Anatomy and Pathologies
Keywords
oropharyngeal dysphagia, oral involvement, swallowing, diagnostic categories
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Deglutition, Deglutition Disorders, Epiglottis, Female, Humans, Hyoid Bone, Male, Middle Aged, Oropharynx

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review