The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Temporal Factors and Speech Recognition Performance in Young and Elderly Listeners
Abstract
This study investigated factors that contribute to deficits of elderly listeners in recognizing speech that is degraded by temporal waveform distortion. Young and elderly listeners with normal hearing sensitivity and with mild-to-moderate, sloping sensorineural hearing losses were evaluated. Low-predictability (LP) sentences from the Revised Speech Perception in Noise test (R-SPIN) (Bilger, Nuetzel, Rabinowitz, & Rzeczkowski, 1984) were presented to subjects in undistorted form and in three forms of distortion: time compression, reverberation, and interruption. Percent-correct recognition scores indicated that age and hearing impairment contributed independently to deficits in recognizing all forms of temporally distorted speech. In addition, subjects’ auditory temporal processing abilities were assessed on duration discrimination and gap detection tasks. Canonical correlation procedures showed that some of the suprathreshold temporal processing measures, especially gap duration discrimination, contributed to the ability to recognize reverberant speech. The overall conclusion is that age-related factors other than peripheral hearing loss contribute to diminished speech recognition performance of elderly listeners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Cited by
Tallal, P., Miller, S. L., Bedi, G., Byma, G., Wang, X., Nagarajan, S. S., Schreiner, C., Jenkins, W. M., & Merzenich, M. M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5245.81 · Cited by 1,197
Inhibitory neurotransmission, plasticity and aging in the mammalian central auditory system
Caspary, D. M., Ling, L., Turner, J. G., & Hughes, L. F. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.013581 · Cited by 481
Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding
Anderson, S., Parbery-Clark, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2176-12.2012 · Cited by 377
Cognitive aging and auditory information processing
Pichora-Fuller, M. K. (2003) · International Journal of Audiology · doi:10.3109/14992020309074641 · Cited by 339
Hearing loss and aging: New research findings and clinical implications
Gordon-Salant, S. (2005) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.01.0006 · Cited by 300
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Published
- 1993-12
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1276-1285
- ISSN
- 1092-4388 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9102
- OpenAlex
- W2072274775
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Temporal Factors and Speech Recognition Performance in Young and Elderly Listeners. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1044/jshr.3606.1276
- The paper
- Gordon-Salant, S., & Fitzgibbons, P. J. (1993). Temporal Factors and Speech Recognition Performance in Young and Elderly Listeners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3606.1276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.