The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding
Open accessAbstract
Older adults frequently report they can hear what is said but cannot understand the meaning, especially in noise. This difficulty may arise from the inability to process rapidly changing elements of speech. Aging is accompanied by a general slowing of neural processing and decreased neural inhibition, both of which likely interfere with temporal processing in auditory and other sensory domains. Age-related reductions in inhibitory neurotransmitter levels and delayed neural recovery can contribute to decreases in the temporal precision of the auditory system. Decreased precision may lead to neural timing delays, reductions in neural response magnitude, and a disadvantage in processing the rapid acoustic changes in speech. The auditory brainstem response (ABR), a scalp-recorded electrical potential, is known for its ability to capture precise neural synchrony within subcortical auditory nuclei; therefore, we hypothesized that a loss of temporal precision results in subcortical timing delays and decreases in response consistency and magnitude. To assess this hypothesis, we recorded ABRs to the speech syllable /da/ in normal hearing younger (18–30 years old) and older (60–67 years old) adult humans. Older adults had delayed ABRs, especially in response to the rapidly changing formant transition, and greater response variability. We also found that older adults had decreased phase locking and smaller response magnitudes than younger adults. Together, our results support the theory that older adults have a loss of temporal precision in the subcortical encoding of sound, which may account, at least in part, for their difficulties with speech perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment
Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bédirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., Cummings, J. L., & Chertkow, H. (2005) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x · Cited by 25,553
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,737
Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence
Dumont, R., Willis, J. O., Veizel, K., & Zibulsky, J. (2014) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9781118660584.ese2519 · Cited by 5,521
Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations
Giraud, A.-L., & Poeppel, D. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3063 · Cited by 1,917
An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants
Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907526 · Cited by 1,869
Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer
Klatt, D. H. (1980) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.383940 · Cited by 1,583
Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human
Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., & Pernier, J. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04240.1996 · Cited by 1,534
Music training for the development of auditory skills
Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2882 · Cited by 1,115
Self-citationPhase Patterns of Neuronal Responses Reliably Discriminate Speech in Human Auditory Cortex
Luo, H., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.004 · Cited by 995
Auditory Brain Stem Response to Complex Sounds: A Tutorial
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2010) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0b013e3181cdb272 · Cited by 775
Self-citation
Cited by
Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL)
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Kramer, S. E., Eckert, M. A., Edwards, B., Hornsby, B. W. Y., Humes, L. E., Lemke, U., Lunner, T., Matthen, M., Mackersie, C. L., et al. (2016) · Ear & Hearing · doi:10.1097/aud.0000000000000312 · Cited by 1,318
Cortical contributions to the auditory frequency-following response revealed by MEG
Coffey, E. B. J., Herholz, S. C., Chepesiuk, A. M. P., Baillet, S., & Zatorre, R. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11070 · Cited by 389
Aging and speech understanding
Lee, J. Y. (2015) · Journal of Audiology and Otology · doi:10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.7 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, S., Parbery-Clark, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2012-10-10
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 41
- Pages
- 14156-14164
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2024442432
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.2176-12.2012
- The paper
- Anderson, S., Parbery-Clark, A., White-Schwoch, T., & Kraus, N. (2012). Aging Affects Neural Precision of Speech Encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2176-12.2012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.