A Community of Relations: Mukurtu Hubs and Spokes
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes the history of CMS and our current project Mukurtu Hubs and Spokes: A Sustainable National Platform for Community Archiving funded by the IMLS as part of their National Digital Platform initiative in 2016. This project is an extension of the social, cultural, and technical work of developing the CMS software to the current 2.0.7 release. CMS is community driven software that addresses the ethical curation of, and access to, cultural heritage. The Hubs and Spokes grant will create regional centers of support and training and update the software to a 3.0 release. Each hub will contribute to the software updates and provide local training and support for community users.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mukurtu (Dilly Bag) CMS is a community driven software that addresses the ethical curation of, and access to, Indigenous cultural heritage.
“Mukurtu (Dilly Bag) CMS is a “community driven software that addresses the ethical curation of, and access to, [Indigenous] cultural heritage” (Christen et al., 2017 para. 2).”
From Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization (2021) · cites this paper as Christen et al., 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1][1] Christen, K. (2011). Opening Archives: Respectful Repatriation. American Archivist, 74(1), 185-210.
- [2][2] Christen, K. (2012). Does Information Really Want to be Free?: Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness. The International Journal of Communication, 6, 2870-2893.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing the digital landscape: the role of technology in Indigenous language revitalization
Meighan, P. J. (2021) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801211037672 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Christen, K., Merrill, A., & Wynne, M.
- ORCID
- Merrill, Alex
- Venue
- D-Lib Magazine
- Publisher
- CNRI Acct
- Published
- 2017-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5/6
- ISSN
- 1082-9873 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2614001069
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 29.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- public-domain
- Locations
- D-Lib Magazine (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
- Keywords
- community archiving, cultural heritage, CMS software, digital platforms, indigenous knowledge, open source software
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
