Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 338

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: MULTIPROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES: PRIMARY CUTANEOUS SCC

Open access
Motley, R., Kersey, P., Lawrence, C.·2002·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

These guidelines for management of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma present evidence-based guidance for treatment, with identification of the strength of evidence available at the time of preparation of the guidelines, and a brief overview of epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and investigation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0007-0963.2001.04615.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 338

Metadata

Authors
Motley, R., Kersey, P., & Lawrence, C.
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2002-01
Volume
146
Issue
1
Pages
18-25
ISSN
0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1839300039
Cited by
338
References
44
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: MULTIPROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES: PRIMARY CUTANEOUS SCC. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0007-0963.2001.04615.x
The paper
Motley, R., Kersey, P., & Lawrence, C. (2002). Multiprofessional guidelines for the management of the patient with primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: MULTIPROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES: PRIMARY CUTANEOUS SCC. British Journal of Dermatology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0007-0963.2001.04615.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.