Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Experimental studies on CO 2 assimilation of mesophytic C3 plants in relation to relative water content (RWC) are discussed. Decreasing RWC slows the actual rate of photosynthetic CO 2 assimilation (A) and decreases the potential rate (A pot ). Generally, as RWC falls from c . 100 to c. 75%, the stomatal conductance (g s ) decreases, and with it A. However, there are two general types of relation of A pot to RWC, which are called Type 1 and Type 2. Type 1 has two main phases. As RWC decreases from 100 to c. 75%, A pot is unaffected, but decreasing stomatal conductance (g s ) results in smaller A, and lower CO 2 concentration inside the leaf (C i ) and in the chloroplast (C c ), the latter falling possibly to the compensation point. Down‐regulation of electron transport occurs by energy quenching mechanisms, and changes in carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism are considered acclimatory, caused by low C i and reversible by elevated CO 2 . Below 75% RWC, there is metabolic inhibition of A pot , inhibition of A then being partly (but progressively less) reversible by elevated CO 2 ; g s regulates A progressively less, and C i and CO 2 compensation point, Γ rise. It is suggested that this is the true stress phase, where the decrease in A pot is caused by decreased ATP synthesis and a consequent decreased synthesis of RuBP. In the Type 2 response, A pot decreases progressively at RWC 100 to 75%, with A being progressively less restored to the unstressed value by elevated CO 2 . Decreased g s leads to a lower C i and C c but they probably do not reach compensation point: g s becomes progressively less important and metabolic limitations more important as RWC falls. The primary effect of low RWC on A pot is most probably caused by limited RuBP synthesis, as a result of decreased ATP synthesis, either through inhibition of Coupling Factor activity or amount due to increased ion concentration. Carbohydrate synthesis and accumulation decrease. Type 2 response is considered equivalent to Type 1 at RWC below c. 75%, with A pot inhibited by limited ATP and RuBP synthesis, respiratory metabolism dominates and C i and Γ rise. The importance of inhibited ATP synthesis as a primary cause of decreasing A pot is discussed. Factors determining the Type 1 and Type 2 responses are unknown. Electron transport is maintained (but down‐regulated) in Types 1 and 2 over a wide range of RWC, and a large reduced/oxidized adenylate ratio results. Metabolic imbalance results in amino acid accumulation and decreased and altered protein synthesis. These conditions profoundly affect cell functions and ultimately cause cell death. Type 1 and 2 responses may reflect differences in g s and in sensitivity of metabolism to decreasing RWC.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The leaf net CO2 assimilation rate of higher plants decreases substantially as leaf water potential and relative water content decrease.
“Lawlor and Cornic (2002) reported that the leaf net CO 2 assimilation rate (P N ) of higher plants decreased substantially as the leaf water potential and relative water content (RWC) decreased.”
From Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview (2013) · cites this paper as Lawlor and Cornic 2002
Cites
Gunasekera, D., & Berkowitz, G. A. (1993) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.103.2.629 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845 · see citing works
Photosynthesis under stressful environments: An overview
Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2013) · Photosynthetica · doi:10.1007/s11099-013-0021-6 · Cited by 2,028 · see citing works
GRASSI, G., & MAGNANI, F. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01333.x · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Pepe, M., Crescente, M. F., & Varone, L. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11070899 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Lawlor, D. W.
- ORCID
- Cornic, G.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 275-294
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2160437934
- Cited by
- 1,994
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 107 · 2022: 116 · 2021: 162 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 106 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 102 · 2014: 127 · 2013: 99 · 2012: 97
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Keywords
- photosynthetic carbon assimilation, drought stress, relative water content, stomatal conductance, CO2 compensation point, ATP production, carbohydrate metabolism, nitrogen metabolism, acclimation, elevated CO2, photosynthesis inhibition, water stress, chloroplasts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review