The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling the distribution of bats in relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain environment
Abstract
1 Landscape modification is often considered the principal cause of population decline in many bat species. Thus, schemes for bat conservation rely heavily on knowledge about species–landscape relationships. So far, however, few studies have quantified the possible influence of landscape structure on large-scale spatial patterns in bat communities. 2 This study presents quantitative models that use landscape structure to predict (i) spatial patterns in overall community composition and (ii) individual species’ distributions through canonical correspondence analysis and generalized linear models, respectively. A geographical information system (GIS) was then used to draw up maps of (i) overall community patterns and (ii) distribution of potential species’ habitats. These models relied on field data from the Swiss Jura mountains. 3 Eight descriptors of landscape structure accounted for 30% of the variation in bat community composition. For some species, more than 60% of the variance in distribution could be explained by landscape structure. Elevation, forest or woodland cover, lakes and suburbs, were the most frequent predictors. 4 This study shows that community composition in bats is related to landscape structure through species-specific relationships to resources. Due to their nocturnal activities and the difficulties of remote identification, a comprehensive bat census is rarely possible, and we suggest that predictive modelling of the type described here provides an indispensable conservation tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
Cited by
Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C., & Hastie, T. (2002) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00204-1 · Cited by 2,356
Self-citationPredicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography
Guisan, A., & Hofer, U. (2003) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00914.x · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaberg, C., & Guisan, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1169-1181
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1985448383
- Cited by
- 192
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling the distribution of bats in relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00668.x
- The paper
- Jaberg, C., & Guisan, A. (2001). Modelling the distribution of bats in relation to landscape structure in a temperate mountain environment. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00668.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.