The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography
Abstract
Aim To explore the respective power of climate and topography to predict the distribution of reptiles in Switzerland, hence at a mesoscale level. A more detailed knowledge of these relationships, in combination with maps of the potential distribution derived from the models, is a valuable contribution to the design of conservation strategies. Location All of Switzerland. Methods Generalized linear models are used to derive predictive habitat distribution models from eco‐geographical predictors in a geographical information system, using species data from a field survey conducted between 1980 and 1999. Results The maximum amount of deviance explained by climatic models is 65%, and 50% by topographical models. Low values were obtained with both sets of predictors for three species that are widely distributed in all parts of the country (Anguis fragilis, Coronella austriaca, and Natrix natrix), a result that suggests that including other important predictors, such as resources, should improve the models in further studies. With respect to topographical predictors, low values were also obtained for two species where we anticipated a strong response to aspect and slope, Podarcis muralis and Vipera aspis. Main conclusions Overall, both models and maps derived from climatic predictors more closely match the actual reptile distributions than those based on topography. These results suggest that the distributional limits of reptile species with a restricted range in Switzerland are largely set by climatic, predominantly temperature‐related, factors.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“GCM-derived environmental variables were chosen based on broad autecological analogy with their most closely related living organisms [crocodiles + birds (88–90)].”
From Asteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction (2020) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cites
A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models
FIELDING, A. H., & BELL, J. F. (1997) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892997000088 · Cited by 6,956
COMPETITIVE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TREE SPECIES IN NEW ZEALAND'S OLD-GROWTH INDIGENOUS FORESTS
Leathwick, J. R., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2560:cibtsi]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 243
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.t01-1-980116.x · DOI
- 10.1080/02693799208901899 · DOI
- 10.2307/2404755 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00048865 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00194-1 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1996.tb01262.x · DOI
- 10.1177/001316446002000104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1467-9876.00147 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97269.x · DOI
- Corsi F., 2000, Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences, 389
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00202-8 · DOI
- Franklin J., 2000, Terrain analysis: principles and applications
- Gasc J.‐P., 1997, Atlas of amphibians and reptiles in Europe, 496
- Guisan A., 2001, Les reptiles de Suisse
- 10.1127/phyto/30/2000/353 · DOI
- 10.1890/06-0539 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1009841519580 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-0348-8316-0 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00668.x · DOI
- Jones M.T., 2002, Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale, 411
- 10.2307/3237290 · DOI
- Leser H., 1977, Feld‐ und Labormethoden des Geomorphologie, 10.1515/9783110857467 · DOI
- Longmore R., 1986, Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia. Number 7
- 10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00113-1 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1997.00209.x · DOI
- 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0037:PGWLRL]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Monney J.‐C., 1996, Biologie comparée de Vipera aspis L. et de Vipera berus L. (Reptilia, Ophidia, Viperidae) dans une station des Préalpes bernoises, 174
- 10.2307/3236378 · DOI
- Nix H., 1986, Atlas of elapid snakes of Australia, 4
- OFT, 2002, Digital height model level 2, product information
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00190-4 · DOI
- 10.2307/2845088 · DOI
- Patthey P., 2003, Habitat and corridor selection of an expanding red deer (Cevus elaphus) population
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7 · DOI
- Pereira J.M.C., 1991, GIS‐based habitat modelling using logistic multiple regression:a study of the Mt Graham Red Squirrel, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 57, 1475
- Scott J.M., 2002, Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale
- 10.1023/A:1021342611769 · DOI
- Vincent P.J., 1983, Poisson regression models of species abundance, Journal of Biogeography, 10, 153, 10.2307/2844625 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00199-0 · DOI
Cited by
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
Self-citationAsteroid impact, not volcanism, caused the end-Cretaceous dinosaur extinction
Chiarenza, A. A., Farnsworth, A., Mannion, P. D., Lunt, D. J., Valdes, P. J., Morgan, J. V., & Allison, P. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2006087117 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Guisan, A., & Hofer, U.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-07-23
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1233-1243
- ISSN
- 0305-0270
- 1365-2699
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00914.x
- The paper
- Guisan, A., & Hofer, U. (2003). Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00914.x