The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader?
Abstract
• Plant symbiotic fungi are generally thought to express a single lifestyle that might increase (mutualism), decrease (parasitism), or have no influence (commensalism) on host fitness. However, data are presented here demonstrating that plant pathogenic Colletotrichum species are able to asymptomatically colonize plants and express nonpathogenic lifestyles. • Experiments were conducted in growth chambers and plant colonization was assessed by emergence of fungi from surface sterilized plant tissues. Expression of symbiotic lifestyles was assessed by monitoring the ability of fungi to confer disease resistance, drought tolerance and growth enhancement. • Several pathogenic Colletotrichum species expressed either mutualistic or commensal lifestyles in plants not known to be hosts. Mutualists conferred disease resistance, drought tolerance, and/or growth enhancement to host plants. Lifestyle-altered mutants expressing nonpathogenic lifestyles had greater host ranges than the parental wildtype isolate. Successive colonization studies indicated that the ability of a symbiont to colonize a plant was dependent on previous colonization events and the lifestyles expressed by the initial colonizing fungus. • The results indicate that the outcome of symbiosis is controlled by the plant's physiology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colletotrichum: Biology, Pathology and Control
Uecker, F. A., Bailey, J. A., & Jegor, M. J. (1993) · Mycologia · doi:10.2307/3760628 · Cited by 752
Cited by
Endophytic fungi: a source of novel biologically active secondary metabolites
Schulz, B., Boyle, C., Draeger, S., Römmert, A.-K., & Krohn, K. (2002) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1017/s0953756202006342 · Cited by 1,206
Invasive Plant Suppresses the Growth of Native Tree Seedlings by Disrupting Belowground Mutualisms
Stinson, K. A., Campbell, S. A., Powell, J. R., Wolfe, B. E., Callaway, R. M., Thelen, G. C., Hallett, S. G., Prati, D., & Klironomos, J. N. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040140 · Cited by 826
Plant infection and the establishment of fungal biotrophy
Mendgen, K., & Hahn, M. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02297-5 · Cited by 468
Anthracnose disease of switchgrass caused by the novel fungal species Colletotrichum navitas
Crouch, J. A., Beirn, L. A., Cortese, L. M., Bonos, S. A., & Clarke, B. B. (2009) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2009.09.010 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Redman, R. S., Dunigan, D. D., & Rodriguez, R. J.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 705-716
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2104360899
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00210.x
- The paper
- Redman, R. S., Dunigan, D. D., & Rodriguez, R. J. (2001). Fungal symbiosis from mutualism to parasitism: who controls the outcome, host or invader? New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646x.2001.00210.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.