Cited by 170Geological and Geochemical AnalysisGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisThermal and Kinetic Analysis

Assessing the extent of disequilibrium and overstepping of prograde metamorphic reactions in metapelites from the Bushveld Complex aureole, South Africa

Waters, D. J., Lovegrove, D. P.·2002·Journal of Metamorphic Geology

Abstract

Andalusite–staurolite–biotite hornfels metamorphosed beneath the mafic layered rocks of the Bushveld Complex, South Africa, preserves a detailed record of the relative timing of porphyroblast growth and metamorphic reactions. The sequence inferred from microstructures shows considerable overlap of the period of growth of porphyroblasts of staurolite, cordierite, biotite and andalusite, and the persistence over a similar interval of the reactant porphyroblastic phase chloritoid. This is inconsistent with calculations of equilibrium phase relations, and implies that disequilibrium processes controlled the prograde reaction sequence, despite the slow heating rates involved (1 °C per 10 000 yr). The early appearance of cordierite by a metastable reaction and its subsequent disappearance indicates that delayed nucleation of porphyroblastic phases, rather than simply sluggish reaction, is required to account for the sequence of growth. The predicted reactions for the first appearance of andalusite and staurolite have low entropy of reaction, and do not occur until they have been overtaken in terms of reaction affinity by high‐entropy devolatilisation reactions involving the breakdown of chlorite. Once the porphyroblasts have nucleated, metastable chloritoid‐breakdown reactions also contribute to their growth. The implied magnitude of the critical overstepping for andalusite nucleation is around 5 kJ mole−1 (equivalent to 40 °C for the chlorite‐breakdown reaction), and that for othe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0263-4929.2001.00350.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Forward phase equilibrium modeling has weaknesses, including geological uncertainties (kinetic factors, determination of the reactive bulk composition, compositional variations due to partial melting) and database/software limitations, which are difficult to quantify and may affect the outcome of every phase equilibrium model.

    “However, the forward phase equilibrium modeling approach also has its weaknesses, including both geological uncertainties such as kinetic factors (e.g.,Waters and Lovegrove 2002, Carlson et al. 2015, Pattison and Spear 2018), determination of the reactive bulk composition (e.g.,Palin et al. 2016), and compositional variations due to partial melting (e.g.,Guevara and Caddick 2016); and database-and”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, D. J., & Lovegrove, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Waters, D. J.
  • Lovegrove, D. P.
Venue
Journal of Metamorphic Geology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
135-149
ISSN
  • 0263-4929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1314
OpenAlex
W2160930979
Cited by
170
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Metamorphic Geology (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geophysics › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal and Kinetic Analysis
Keywords
prograde metamorphism, disequilibrium, overstepping, andalusite, staurolite, cordierite, biotite, porphyroblast growth, hornfels, metapelites, nucleation, reaction kinetics, reaction entropy, pseudomorphs, grain size distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review