Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The selective vulnerability of nerve cells in Huntington's disease

Sieradzan, K. A., Mann, D. M. A.·2001·Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology

Abstract

It is now more than 7 years since the genetic mutation causing Huntington's disease (HD) was first identified. Unstable CAG expansion in the IT15 gene, responsible for disease, is translated into an abnormally long polyglutamine (polyQ) tract near the N‐terminus of the huntingtin protein. The presence of expanded polyQ in the mutant protein leads to its abnormal proteolytic cleavage with liberation of toxic N‐terminal fragments that tend to aggregate, probably first in the cytoplasm. Subsequent nuclear translocation of the cleaved mutant huntingtin is associated with formation of intranuclear protein aggregates and neurotoxicity, probably involving apoptotic cascades. These processes, which can be experimentally modelled in cultured neuronal and non‐neuronal cells, seem to underlie neurodegeneration in HD, and also other polyQ disorders, such as dentatorubro‐pallidoluysian degeneration, spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy and the spinocerebellar ataxias. They do not, however, explain why within the corpus striatum and cerebral cortex certain nerve cells are susceptible to disease and others are not. In the human HD brain, vulnerable pyramidal neurones within the deeper layers of the cerebral cortex frequently contain large intranuclear inclusions composed of N‐terminal fragments of huntingtin. Such inclusions are, however, rare within neurones of the striatum, even in the medium spiny neurones preferentially lost from this region. While inclusions per se do not seem to be neurotoxic, they may provide a surrogate marker of molecular pathology. Recent studies indicate that the nuclear accumulation of mutant huntingtin interferes with transcriptional events. Of particular importance may be the effect on the genes encoding neurotransmitter receptor proteins, especially those involved with glutamatergic neurotransmission. Such changes may trigger or facilitate a low‐grade, chronic excitotoxicity of the glutamatergic cortical projection neurones on their target cells in the striatum, already partly compromised by the toxic effects of the HD mutation. This combination of insults, for anatomical reasons experienced predominantly by striatal projection neurones, would eventually cause their selective demise.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.0305-1846.2001.00299.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Sieradzan, K. A., & Mann, D. M. A.
Venue
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-02
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2990
OpenAlex
W2014309298
Cited by
180
References
5
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The selective vulnerability of nerve cells in Huntington's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0305-1846.2001.00299.x
The paper
Sieradzan, K. A., & Mann, D. M. A. (2001). The selective vulnerability of nerve cells in Huntington's disease. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-1846.2001.00299.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.