The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells and interneurons are climbing fibre‐specific
Abstract
In cats decerebrated at the intercollicular level, the cutaneous parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells, molecular layer interneurons and Golgi cells in the cerebellar C3 zone were delineated by natural stimulation of the skin during extracellular unitary recordings. The locations of these receptive fields were compared with the climbing fibre receptive field of the local Purkinje cell and with the receptive fields of other neurons located along a beam of parallel fibres. The parallel fibre receptive fields of these neurons were highly specific to the local climbing fibre receptive field. In Purkinje cells, the parallel fibre receptive fields were located outside the climbing fibre receptive field of the same cell. In contrast, the parallel fibre receptive fields of interneurons were similar to the receptive field of the locally terminating climbing fibres. In both types of neurons, the parallel fibre receptive fields were small and had distinct borders. The location on the skin of the parallel fibre receptive fields differed conspicuously between neighbouring Purkinje cells and between neighbouring interneurons along a beam as well as between Purkinje cells and interneurons in the same electrode tracks. The remarkable specificity between the parallel fibre receptive fields in Purkinje cells and interneurons and the receptive field of the local climbing fibre is most easily explained by different forms of parallel fibre synaptic plasticity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Liao, D., Hessler, N. A., & Malinow, R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/375400a0 · Cited by 1,365
Long-term potentiation and functional synapse induction in developing hippocampus
Durand, G. M., Kovalchuk, Y., & Konnerth, A. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381071a0 · Cited by 789
Wang, S. S.-H., Khiroug, L., & Augustine, G. J. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.130414597 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine
Ito, M. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006 · Cited by 880
Jörntell, H., & Hansel, C. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.032 · Cited by 383
Self-citationA century of cerebellar somatotopy: a debated representation
Manni, E., & Petrosini, L. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1347 · Cited by 271
Optimal Information Storage and the Distribution of Synaptic Weights
Brunel, N., Hakim, V., Isope, P., Nadal, J.-P., & Barbour, B. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.023 · Cited by 270
Developmental Changes in Parvalbumin Regulate Presynaptic Ca2+Signaling
Collin, T., Chat, M., Lucas, M. G., Moreno, H., Racay, P., Schwaller, B., Marty, A., & Llano, I. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3748-04.2005 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekerot, C., & Jörntell, H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1303-1310
- ISSN
- 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9568
- OpenAlex
- W1997990962
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells and interneurons are climbing fibre‐specific. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01499.x
- The paper
- Ekerot, C., & Jörntell, H. (2001). Parallel fibre receptive fields of Purkinje cells and interneurons are climbing fibre‐specific. European Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01499.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.