Quantification of spread of cerebellar long-term depression with chemical two-photon uncaging of glutamate
Open accessAbstract
Localized, chemical two-photon photolysis of caged glutamate was used to map the changes in alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid-type glutamate receptors caused by long-term synaptic depression (LTD) in cerebellar Purkinje cells. LTD produced by pairing parallel fiber activity with depolarization was accompanied by a decline in the response of Purkinje cells to uncaged glutamate that accounted for both the time course and magnitude of LTD. This depression of glutamate responses was observed not only at the site of parallel fiber stimulation but also at more distant sites. The amount of LTD decreased with distance and was half-maximal 50 microm away from the site of parallel fiber activity. Estimation of the number of parallel fibers active during LTD induction indicates that LTD modified glutamate receptors not only at active synapses but also at 600 times as many inactive synapses on a single Purkinje cell. Therefore, both active and inactive parallel fiber synapses can undergo changes at a postsynaptic locus as a result of associative pre- and postsynaptic activity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
dp-cofilin efficiently diffused along dendrites, enabling heterosynaptic shrinkage of spines along dendrites.
“Despite its binding to F-actins, we demonstrated that dp-cofilin efficiently diffused along dendrites, enabling heterosynaptic shrinkage of spines along dendrites, which was consistent with the spread of LTD along dendrites202122.”
From State-dependent diffusion of actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin underlies the enlargement and shrinkage of dendritic spines (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Spine enlargement and LTP require stronger stimulation compared with spine shrinkage and LTD.
“Spine enlargement and LTP require stronger stimulation compared with those for spine shrinkage and LTD.”
From State-dependent diffusion of actin-depolymerizing factor/cofilin underlies the enlargement and shrinkage of dendritic spines (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
The Results and Discussion describe the induction and spatial spread of cerebellar LTD, but do not compare stimulation requirements for LTP and LTD or for spine enlargement and shrinkage. Searches for those terms found no passage addressing the claimed comparison. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Synapse specificity of long-term potentiation breaks down at short distances
Engert, F., & Bonhoeffer, T. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/40870 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 57
- [1]Sherrington C. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. 2nd Ed. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press; 1947. [Google Scholar]
- [2]Hebb D O. The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. New York: Wiley; 1949. [Google Scholar]
- [3]Kandel E R, Schwartz J H. Science. 1982;218:433–443. doi: 10.1126/science.6289442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [4]Vincent P, Marty A. Neuron. 1993;11:885–893. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90118-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [5]Schuman E M, Madison D V. Science. 1994;263:532–536. doi: 10.1126/science.8290963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [6]McMahon L L, Kauer J A. Neuron. 1997;18:295–305. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80269-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Fitzsimonds R M, Song H J, Poo M M. Nature (London) 1997;388:439–448. doi: 10.1038/41267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [9]Ito M. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:85–102. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.12.030189.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [10]Thompson R F. Phil Trans R Soc London. 1990;329:161–170. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [11]Mauk M D, Garcia K S, Medina J F, Steele P M. Neuron. 1998;20:359–362. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80978-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [12]Lisberger S G. Cell. 1998;92:701–704. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81397-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [13]Ito M, Sakurai M, Tongroach P. J Physiol (London) 1982;324:113–134. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [14]Sakurai M. J Physiol (London) 1987;394:463–480. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [15]Linden D J, Connor J A. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:319–357. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [16]Ekerot C F, Kano M. Brain Res. 1985;342:357–360. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)91136-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [17]Kano M, Kato M. Nature (London) 1987;325:276–279. doi: 10.1038/325276a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [18]Hartell N. Neuron. 1996;16:601–610. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80079-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [19]Linden D J, Dickinson M H, Smeyne M, Connor J A. Neuron. 1991;7:81–89. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(91)90076-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [20]Hemart N, Daniel H, Jaillard D, Crepel F. Neurosci Res. 1994;19:213–221. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90145-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [21]Pettit D L, Wang S S-H, Gee K R, Augustine G J. Neuron. 1997;19:465–471. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80361-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [22]Edwards F A, Konnerth A, Sakmann B, Takahashi T. Pflügers Arch. 1989;414:600–612. doi: 10.1007/BF00580998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [23]Doroshenko P A, Woppmann A, Miljanich G, Augustine G J. Neuropharmacology. 1997;36:865–872. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(97)00032-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [24]Wang S S-H, Augustine G J. Neuron. 1995;15:755–760. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90167-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [25]Eilers J-K, Augustine G J, Konnerth A. Nature (London) 1995;373:155–158. doi: 10.1038/373155a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [26]Finch E A, Augustine G J. Nature (London) 1998;396:753–756. doi: 10.1038/25541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [27]Jolliffe I T. Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer; 1986. [Google Scholar]
- [28]Mitra P P, Pesaran B. Biophys J. 1999;76:691–708. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(99)77236-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [29]Kandler K, Katz L C, Kauer J A. Nat Neurosci. 1998;1:119–123. doi: 10.1038/368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [30]Honore T, Drejer J, Fletcher E J, Jacobson P, Lodge D, Nielson F E. Science. 1988;241:701–703. doi: 10.1126/science.2899909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [31]Perkel D J, Hestrin S, Sah P, Nicoll R A. Proc R Soc London B. 1990;241:116–121. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1990.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [32]Konnerth A, Llano I, Armstrong C M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:2662–2665. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [33]Palay S L, Chan-Palay V. Cerebellar Cortex. Berlin: Springer; 1974. [Google Scholar]
- [34]Pettit, D. L. & Augustine, G. J. (2000) J. Neurophysiol., in press. [DOI] [PubMed]
- [35]Takechi H, Eilers J, Konnerth A. Nature (London) 1998;396:757–760. doi: 10.1038/25547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [36]Sakurai M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1990;87:3383–3385. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [37]Crepel F, Jaillard D. J Physiol (London) 1991;432:123–141. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [38]Konnerth A, Dreessen J, Augustine G J. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:7051–7055. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.15.7051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [39]Karachot L, Kado R T, Ito M. Neurosci Res. 1994;21:161–168. doi: 10.1016/0168-0102(94)90158-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [40]Salin P A, Malenka R C, Nicoll R A. Neuron. 1996;16:797–803. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80099-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [41]Napper R M A, Harvey R J. J Comp Neurol. 1988;274:158–167. doi: 10.1002/cne.902740203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [42]Harris K M, Stevens J K. J Neurosci. 1988;8:4455–4469. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-12-04455.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
- [43]Barbour B. Neuron. 1993;11:759–769. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90085-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [44]Lev-Ram V, Jiang T, Wood J, Lawrence D S, Tsien R Y. Neuron. 1997;18:1025–1038. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80340-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [45]Berry M, Bradley P. Brain Res. 1976;112:1–35. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(76)90331-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [46]Spruston N, Jaffe D B, Williams S H, Johnston D. J Neurophysiol. 1993;70:781–802. doi: 10.1152/jn.1993.70.2.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [47]Kullmann D M, Asztely F. Trends Neurosci. 1998;21:8–14. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(97)01150-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [48]Napper R M A, Harvey R J. Comp Neurol. 1988;274:168–177. doi: 10.1002/cne.902740204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [49]Llinas R, Bloedel J R, Hillman D E. J Neurophysiol. 1969;32:847–870. doi: 10.1152/jn.1969.32.6.847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [50]Hartell N A. J Neurosci. 1996;16:2881–2890. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-09-02881.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [51]Kasono K, Hirano T. NeuroReport. 1995;6:569–572. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199502000-00040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [52]Khodakhah K, Armstrong C M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:14009–14114. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.14009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [53]Häusser M. Soc Neurosci Abstr. 1994;20:891. [Google Scholar]
- [54]Malinski T, Taha Z, Grunfeld S, Patton S, Kapturczak M, Tomboulian P. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;193:1076–1082. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1993.1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [55]Huang R-C, Gillette R. J Gen Physiol. 1991;98:835–848. doi: 10.1085/jgp.98.4.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [56]Ito M, Karachot L. Neurosci Res. 1992;14:27–38. doi: 10.1016/s0168-0102(05)80004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [57]Nakazawa K, Mikawa S, Hashikawa T, Ito M. Neuron. 1995;15:697–709. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90157-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
- [58]Boxall A R, Lancaster B, Garthwaite J. Neuron. 1996;16:805–813. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80100-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matsuzaki, M., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Nemoto, T., Miyashita, Y., Iino, M., & Kasai, H. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn736 · Cited by 1,563 · see citing works
Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine
Ito, M. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.02.006 · Cited by 880 · see citing works
GABA promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines by controlling local Ca2+ signaling
Hayama, T., Noguchi, J., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, N., Hayashi-Takagi, A., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R., Matsuzaki, M., & Kasai, H. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3496 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Welniarz, Q., Worbe, Y., & Gallea, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2021.644059 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Noguchi, J., Hayama, T., Watanabe, S., Ucar, H., Yagishita, S., Takahashi, N., & Kasai, H. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32897 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wang, S. S.-H., Khiroug, L., & Augustine, G. J.
- Affiliations
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Corresponding author
- Augustine, George J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- National Academy of Sciences
- Published
- 2000-07-11
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 8635-8640
- ISSN
- 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
- 1091-6490
- PMC
- PMC27000
- OpenAlex
- W1986155820
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS034045, NS-09457, F32NS009457, NS34045)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- long-term depression, Purkinje cells, caged glutamate, two-photon photolysis, AMPA receptors, parallel fiber synapses, synaptic plasticity, postsynaptic plasticity, associative plasticity, glutamate uncaging
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cerebellum, Glutamates, Purkinje Cells, Time Factors, Photons, Receptors, AMPA, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review