Purification of Purkinje cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from transgenic mice that express green fluorescent protein
Abstract
The cerebellar Purkinje cell has been the focus of numerous studies involving the analysis of development and information processing in the nervous system. Purkinje cells represent less than 0.1% of the total cell content of the cerebellum. To facilitate studies of molecules that are expressed in such a small proportion of neurons, we have established procedures for the purification of these cells. Transgenic mice were developed in which the expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was controlled by the L7 promoter. In adult cerebellum, GFP fluorescence was only detected in Purkinje cells, where it filled dendrites, soma and axons. GFP fluorescence was detected in Purkinje cells as early as embryonic day 17 and increased during development in vivo and in dissociated cerebellar culture. Mirroring endogenous L7 expression, high levels of GFP were observed in retinal rod bipolar cells. Lower levels of GFP were seen in olfactory periglomerular cells, neurons in the interpeduncular nucleus, and superior colliculus neurons. Cerebella from transgenic mice were dissociated by mild enzymatic treatment and Purkinje cells were isolated by fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS). By selecting optimal parameters, a fraction of viable Purkinje cells that was 94% pure was obtained. These results indicate that FACS is a powerful tool for isolating Purkinje cells from postnatal L7‐GFP transgenic mice. GFP‐positive neurons will also be useful in the real‐time observation of dendritic morphogenesis and axonal outgrowth during development, or after neuronal activity in vitro.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell populations such as laser capture microdissection, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, or manual sorting.
“Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain has mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell population such as laser capture microdissection (Meguro et al., 2004, Rossner et al., 2006), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Tomomura et al., 2001, Lobo et al., 2006), or manual sorting (Sugino et al., 2006).”
From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Tomomura et al., 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cell type–specific mRNA purification by translating ribosome affinity purification (TRAP)
Heiman, M., Kulicke, R., Fenster, R. J., Greengard, P., & Heintz, N. (2014) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2014.085 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Amacrine-Signaled Loss of Intrinsic Axon Growth Ability by Retinal Ganglion Cells
Goldberg, J. L., Klassen, M. P., Hua, Y., & Barres, B. A. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1068428 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain
He, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, M. Q., Hannon, G. J., & Huang, Z. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.010 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Genetic address book for retinal cell types
Siegert, S., Scherf, B. G., Del Punta, K., Didkovsky, N., Heintz, N., & Roska, B. (2009) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2370 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Nishiyama, J., Miura, E., Mizushima, N., Watanabe, M., & Yuzaki, M. (2007) · Autophagy · doi:10.4161/auto.4964 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Self-citationRole of glial cells in the formation and maintenance of synapses
Pfrieger, F. W. (2010) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.11.002 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Molecular neuroanatomy: a generation of progress
Pollock, J. D., Wu, D.-Y., & Satterlee, J. S. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.001 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tomomura, M., Rice, D. S., Morgan, J. I., & Yuzaki, M.
- Venue
- European Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57-63
- ISSN
- 0953-816X
- 1460-9568
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review